Teams

CC SLOCC Bodnar 3.5W

2025 USTA CC Spring Adult 18 & OVER · CC USTA 3.5W 18 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-06-03vs CC TTR Pastel Crew 3.5WWon 30
W#1 DoublesTami Rose / Jean Kennedy vs Darla Batistic / Joan Jordan7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesRose Ancheta vs Zoya Dixon6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAmy Stets / Ann Paredes vs Francie Kelley / Fabiola Van Oppen6-1, 6-3
2025-04-27vs CC TTR Pastel Crew 3.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesEdith Martin / Stephanie Ventura vs Libby Kerr / Zoya Dixon2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesRose Ancheta vs Carolyn Lochhead6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAnn Paredes / Amy Stets vs Joan Jordan / Sandra Mcbeth7-6, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CC USTA 3.5W 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Stephanie Ventura
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Rose Ancheta
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.46
Sarah Pedersen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Tracy Hanly
published
3.38
Edith Martin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Masha Schroeder
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.37
Ann Paredes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Roberta Fischer
published
3.35
Dede Bodnar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Tami Rose
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Myki Keffury
published
3.15
Amy Stets
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dede Bodnar + Tracy Hanly6357% games+9.7% vs expected
Stephanie Ventura + Tami Rose9165% games+3.7% vs expected
Roberta Fischer + Ann Paredes7162% games−3.2% vs expected
Ann Paredes + Amy Stets3256% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Ventura + Dede Bodnar314 matchesnot enough data
Roberta Fischer + Edith Martin314 matchesnot enough data
Amy Stets + Edith Martin123 matchesnot enough data
Dede Bodnar + Tami Rose303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Ventura
30W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.51
Rose Ancheta
20W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
Sarah Pedersen
18W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.46
Tracy Hanly
13W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Edith Martin
17W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.38
Masha Schroeder
12W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Ann Paredes
19W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Roberta Fischer
14W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Dede Bodnar
22W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
Tami Rose
17W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Myki Keffury
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Amy Stets
16W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.