Teams

LifeTime Plano/Fenter M5.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S M. League

9 players · average NTRP 4.67 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-21vs Garland/Rodriguez-Campbell M5.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSean Fenter / Jake Williams vs Hunter Scammahorn / Stefan Lochner1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKristopher Liptak vs Paulo Pliego2-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesBurak Berksoy / Michael Mabe vs Cole Burnam / Austin Jones1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJake Williams / Rama Goud vs Rafael Valdez / Byron Talbot2-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesMichael Mabe / Kristopher Liptak vs Andre Vahdat / Rob Cheyne3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSamuel Marcus vs Travis Rafferty3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJake Williams / Rama Goud vs John Spring / Cameron Hillier3-6, 3-6
2025-04-18vs McKinney/Maldonado M5.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesKristopher Liptak / Rama Goud vs Campbell Frost / Diego Orduz3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSamuel Marcus vs Tom Weir6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBurak Berksoy / Michael Mabe vs Ethan Arns / Alexander Hassell6-2, 6-2
2025-04-12vs LifeTime Frisco/Elwood M5.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesSamuel Marcus / Eugene Vainshel vs Ryan Elwood / Mario Jakovljevic0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKristopher Liptak vs Daniel Budd4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Mabe / Burak Berksoy vs Karl Kuhn / Jack Mohr6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S M. League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.36 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.54
Jake Williams
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.39
Burak Berksoy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.34
Samuel Marcus
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.31
Michael Mabe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.29
Rama Goud
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
4.27
Eugene Vainshel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Kristopher Liptak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Max King
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Sean Fenter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Mabe + Burak Berksoy12458% games+2.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Jake Williams
8W–11L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
4.54
4.5
Burak Berksoy
29W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
4.39
Samuel Marcus
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
4.34
Michael Mabe
32W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%8%
4.31
Rama Goud
24W–12L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
4.29
4.5
Eugene Vainshel
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
4.27
Kristopher Liptak
10W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Max King
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sean Fenter
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.