Teams

MV SWIENTON/JACKSON

2025 FW Adult 18 & Over League - Ladies · Friday Ladies 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.30 / TEXAS

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Friday Ladies 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Kim Milam
usually #1 Doubles 30%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.31
Rebekah Seiden
published
3.25
Amy Brenner
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 43% · published 3.5
3.24
Emily Stolz
published 3.5
3.20
Lissa Margo
published
3.14
Melinda Rowland
published
3.12
Angela Swienton
published 3.5
3.08
Julia Murray
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.01
Tricia Spann
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.90
Linda Kiraly
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.89
Emily Watt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Angel Baker
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.79
Malea Grubb
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Vanessa Rutherford
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Kiraly + Tricia Spann5166% games+11.0% vs expected
Emily Watt + Melinda Rowland224 matchesnot enough data
Emily Watt + Tricia Spann033 matchesnot enough data
Emily Stolz + Julia Murray123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Milam
35W–13L career · 17 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.32
Rebekah Seiden
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Amy Brenner
8W–14L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Emily Stolz
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Lissa Margo
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Melinda Rowland
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.14
3.5
Angela Swienton
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Julia Murray
9W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Tricia Spann
28W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
Linda Kiraly
18W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Emily Watt
15W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Angel Baker
6W–2L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
2.85
Malea Grubb
3W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
2.79
Vanessa Rutherford
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.