Teams

ROLLING HILLS 18MX6.0A

2025 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX6.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 18&Over MX6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Michael Almeraris
published
3.31
Ben Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 48%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published 3.5
3.31
Mark Latimer
published
3.19
Curtis Crawford
published 3.5
3.19
Rebecca Peel
published
3.16
Gislaine Webb
published
3.15
Theresa Odisio
published
2.86
Shawn Souza
published
2.84
Julie Jacobson
published
2.84
Alice Chambers
published 3
2.80
Carly Daniels
published 3
Adam Hicks
published 3
Akta Adani
published 3
Chris Souza
published 3
2.42
Stephanie Iezza
published
Jane Jiang
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Almeraris
12W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Ben Nelson
27W–40L career · 23 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.31
Mark Latimer
8W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Curtis Crawford
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.19
Rebecca Peel
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.19
Gislaine Webb
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Theresa Odisio
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
Shawn Souza
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.86
Julie Jacobson
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Alice Chambers
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Carly Daniels
23W–13L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Adam Hicks
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Akta Adani
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Anne Marie McCormick
2W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Chris Souza
2W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Iezza
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%72%28%
2.42
Jane Jiang
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.