Teams

BBTL55/Harwood/Sun City

Mixed 55 & Over · 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-06-24vs BBTL55/Kehres/Hampton HallWon 20
W#1 DoublesTroy Havens / Judi Sharkey vs David Kehres / Theresa Terschan6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJohn Harden / Pam Harms vs George Knoske / Barbara Thompson6-3, 6-0
2025-05-20vs BBTL55/Kehres/Hampton HallWon 21
W#1 DoublesDan Costanza / Jody Winer vs David Kehres / Deborah McGee6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJudi Sharkey / Donald McCarl vs George Knoske / Lisa Odell2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Peters / Steven Nygren vs Barbara Thompson / James Kurdek2-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Art Rothenberg
published 3.5
3.45
Steven Nygren
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Pam Harms
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
William Harwood
published
3.37
Judi Sharkey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
John Harden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Karen McMurtry
published
3.32
Ken Hedgecock
published
3.29
Jody Winer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Alan Chase
published 3.5
3.22
Mark McMurtry
published
3.21
Fiona Harwood
published
3.18
Lori James
published
3.17
GARY ROY
published
2.79
Melissa Dawson
published
Darla Frey
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Fiona Harwood + William Harwood2354% gamesnot enough data
Pam Harms + John Harden5078% gamesnot enough data
Mark McMurtry + Karen McMurtry213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Art Rothenberg
29W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.48
Steven Nygren
32W–10L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.45
Pam Harms
47W–23L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.42
William Harwood
15W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.42
Judi Sharkey
40W–35L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.37
John Harden
34W–12L career · 1 line in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
Karen McMurtry
18W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.34
Ken Hedgecock
32W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Jody Winer
75W–47L career · 1 line in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Alan Chase
8W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mark McMurtry
19W–7L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Fiona Harwood
25W–32L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Lori James
70W–97L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
GARY ROY
20W–9L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Melissa Dawson
21W–33L career · no lines in 2024
0%2%98%
2.79
3
Darla Frey
31W–28L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.