Teams

Tennis Addicts (Tamiami Tennis)

2023 Miami-Dade Adult 18 & Over - Fall Night · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.79 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2022-12-08vs Rodriguez (Ron Ehmann)Won 21
W#1 SinglesJuan Caruso vs Douglas Inciarte6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSergio Barth / Fernando Blasi vs Javier Rodriguez / Michael Gonzalez5-7, 5-7
W#2 SinglesOrlando Santiago vs Yosvany Morejon6-2, 6-2
2022-12-03vs Sengupta (Crandon Park)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesFrancisco Garcia / Fernando Blasi vs Leonardo Concha / Eduardo Graffe3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesOrlando Santiago / Sergio Barth vs Omar Amell / Francisco Dugarte4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJose Vera / Ramon Cordova vs Brett Helms / Luis Felipe Fuenmayor3-6, 1-6
2022-12-01vs Leandro (Crandon Park)Won 20
W#1 SinglesOrlando Santiago vs Alejandro Bonet7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRamon Cordova / Adrian Ledo vs Fernando Aguayo / Savvas Bout6-4, 6-3
2022-11-10Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJuan Caruso vs Gabriel Mercado2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-11-03vs Vitello (Doral Park)Won 30
W#1 DoublesHugo Barraez / Juan Caruso vs ROGER VALECILLOS / Ivan Holmquist0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesFrancisco Garcia / Fernando Blasi vs Mario Vitiello / Daniel MacHado6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesOrlando Santiago / Sergio Barth vs Maury Moreno / Jose Medina6-3, 6-3
2022-10-27Won 10
W#1 SinglesJuan Caruso vs Herminio Fuenmayor6-2, 6-2
2022-10-20vs Taco TennisWon 21
L#1 SinglesOrlando Santiago vs Marcos Baez5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJuan Caruso / Luis Rojas vs Carl Copeland / Eduardo Rodriguez6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRamon Cordova / Sergio Barth vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-10-16Won 20
W#1 SinglesJuan Caruso vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJulio Salazar / Ramon Cordova vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-10-12vs Tichacek (Dante Fascell)Won 21
L#1 SinglesOrlando Santiago vs Lawrence Chen6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSergio Barth / Jose Vera vs Anders Madsen / Mike Tichacek6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRamon Cordova / Jaime Escobar vs Savan Thakkar / Emilio Zapata6-2, 6-2
2022-10-11vs Garcia- 3.0 winners (Tropical Park)Split 22
L#1 SinglesJuan Caruso vs Cesar Orejarena3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesFrancisco Garcia / Sergio Barth vs Juan Cesin / Jorge Mier6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesFernando Blasi vs Juan Coronado2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesRamon Cordova / Jaime Escobar vs Junior Carrasquero / Alberto de la Rosa6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2022-09-22vs Lamis (Coral Pine)Won 21
W#2 DoublesOrlando Santiago / Pedro Nunez vs Lance Aylsworth / Spencer Morgan6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesJuan Caruso vs Michael Goldner2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesFernando Blasi / Jaime Escobar vs David Solares / Ricky Wolcott6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Sergio Barth
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.83
Orlando Santiago
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.79
Fernando Blasi
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.76
Adrian Ledo
published 4
3.74
Hugo Barraez
published
3.61
Francisco Garcia
published
3.55
Juan Caruso
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Singles 13% · published 3.5
3.46
Jose Vera
published
3.34
Ramon Cordova
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Alfredo Nunez
published 3.5
3.29
Julio Salazar
published
3.26
Pedro Nunez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hugo Barraez + Juan Caruso3248% games+8.4% vs expected
Fernando Blasi + Orlando Santiago12555% games+6.6% vs expected
Francisco Garcia + Hugo Barraez5555% games+4.9% vs expected
Orlando Santiago + Jose Vera5355% games+1.8% vs expected
Orlando Santiago + Juan Caruso7355% gamesnot enough data
Orlando Santiago + Ramon Cordova3453% gamesnot enough data
Fernando Blasi + Juan Caruso3354% gamesnot enough data
Ramon Cordova + Juan Caruso4153% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sergio Barth
110W–34L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
3.99
4
Orlando Santiago
147W–63L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Fernando Blasi
134W–49L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Adrian Ledo
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.76
Hugo Barraez
14W–13L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
Francisco Garcia
15W–24L career · no lines in 2023
22%77%<1%
3.61
3.5
Juan Caruso
110W–65L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%37%63%
3.55
Jose Vera
26W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Ramon Cordova
72W–59L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Alfredo Nunez
7W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
Julio Salazar
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
Pedro Nunez
7W–11L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%4%
3.26

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.