Teams

8-JYoung-Eno

2022 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women-Evening

12 players · average NTRP 2.95 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-05-02vs 4-DBaker-Eno-40+ 3.0Lost 03
L#1 SinglesPenny Kraft vs Gretchen LoFrese3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBay Scott / Lilie Bonzani vs Yolanda Deaver / Jimi Harrison1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPamela Howell-Davis / Valerie Williams vs Alexa Hartenstein / Debbie Baker0-6, 4-6
2022-04-27vs 3-CIrish-EnoLost 02
L#1 DoublesBecki Cleveland / Laura Dubois vs Marisa Terruso / Jennifer Leahy4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJonda Young / Lori Davis vs Bladen Leippe / Wendy Sielaty0-6, 2-6
2022-04-20vs 10-CBlommer-EnoWon 40
W#1 DoublesBerna Tareen / Pamela Howell-Davis vs Camille Blommer / Tammy Hood5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJonda Young vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBay Scott / Lilie Bonzani vs Marianne Green / Chrystal Williams6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKerry Espinola / Theresa Kreuzkamp vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-13vs 1-BBlanc-EnoLost 02
L#1 DoublesLaura Dubois / Kerry Espinola vs Tiffany Eastley / Sabrina Kane0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesValerie Williams / Penny Kraft vs Maria Hernandez / Cecilia Edgar1-6, 1-6
2022-03-28vs 6-KLaan-EnoLost 02
L#1 DoublesPamela Howell-Davis / Jonda Young vs Adna Rubio / Maureen Green2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBay Scott / Theresa Kreuzkamp vs Sara Lawrence / Alison Neeley3-6, 0-6
2022-03-21vs 2-SOnstad-CHTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesLilie Bonzani / Becki Cleveland vs Bailey Cook / Sarah Ederle0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKerry Espinola / Penny Kraft vs Robin Wiegerink / Mary Carter Taub4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPamela Howell-Davis / Amanda Laird vs Elizabeth Crabill / Christina Deprez4-6, 1-6
2022-03-14vs 9-AMcneill-CCCLost 03
L#1 SinglesPenny Kraft vs Alise McNeill5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJonda Young / Hannah Harvey vs Jennifer Sykes / Jennifer Crawford2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPamela Howell-Davis / Theresa Kreuzkamp vs Debra Stonehouse / Anne Brady3-6, 1-6
2022-03-07vs 7-Millholland-HRLost 03
L#1 SinglesPamela Howell-Davis vs Lisa Hsu4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTheresa Kreuzkamp / Jonda Young vs Jan ORegan / Nancy Rocamora2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Dubois / Valerie Williams vs Marcella Bria / Adrienne Clough4-6, 4-6
2022-03-02vs 5-DLiller-HSLost 12
L#1 DoublesBecki Cleveland / Laura Dubois vs Kimberly Roberts / Audrey Bilsborrow7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKerry Espinola / Bay Scott vs Lora Hartman / Kristen Bradfield3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJonda Young / Amanda Laird vs Tynita Edwards / Dori Liller1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women-Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Berna Tareen
published 3.5
2.98
Hannah Harvey
published 3
2.85
Becki Cleveland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Kerry Espinola
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.66
Penny Kraft
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.59
Pamela Howell-Davis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.56
Laura Dubois
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.42
Lilie Bonzani
published
2.41
Bay Scott
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.40
Amanda Laird
published 2.5
2.36
Jonda Young
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
Theresa Kreuzkamp
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bay Scott + Jonda Young8558% gamesnot enough data
Jonda Young + Pamela Howell-Davis2637% gamesnot enough data
Penny Kraft + Bay Scott1533% gamesnot enough data
Laura Dubois + Pamela Howell-Davis3356% gamesnot enough data
Becki Cleveland + Kerry Espinola3349% gamesnot enough data
Jonda Young + Kerry Espinola044 matchesnot enough data
Bay Scott + Lilie Bonzani033 matchesnot enough data
Bay Scott + Becki Cleveland123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Berna Tareen
9W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3
Hannah Harvey
21W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Becki Cleveland
113W–109L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Kerry Espinola
130W–131L career · 4 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Penny Kraft
120W–327L career · 4 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
2.66
3
Pamela Howell-Davis
120W–146L career · 6 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
2.59
3
Laura Dubois
82W–106L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
2.56
Lilie Bonzani
6W–18L career · no lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
2.42
3
Bay Scott
68W–136L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
76%24%<1%
2.41
2.5
Amanda Laird
16W–22L career · no lines in 2022
0%78%22%
2.40
2.5
Jonda Young
93W–183L career · 6 lines in 2022
0%86%14%
2.36
Theresa Kreuzkamp
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.