Teams

Burger - No Strings Attached

2025 Baltimore Adult 40 & Over · Baltimore Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-24vs Whitty - Bold StrokesLost 02
L#1 DoublesChristine Hammann / Julie Knight vs Iris Lau / Ginny Spivey1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBernadette Burger / Seema Iyer vs Lynn Chincheck / Dawna Cobb3-6, 2-6
2025-07-19vs Whitty - Bold StrokesWon 10
W#1 SinglesChristine Hammann vs Sarah London6-2, 6-1
2025-07-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesBernadette Burger / Christine Hammann vs Hilary Roxe / Kristen Hessen6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2025-07-10vs Whitty - Bold StrokesLost 12
L#1 DoublesColleen Begg / Ronni Wexler vs Kristen Hessen / Ginny Spivey6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesChristine Hammann vs Genevieve Gigliotti2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJulie Knight / Bernadette Burger vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-07-02vs Whitty - Bold StrokesLost 01
L#1 DoublesColleen Begg / Jenny Eddinger vs Hilary Roxe / Martha Whitty2-6, 0-6
2025-06-26vs Whitty - Bold StrokesWon 10
W#1 DoublesColleen Begg / Gail Lawson vs Leigh Tobin / Lynn Chincheck6-1, 6-2
2025-06-21vs Whitty - Bold StrokesLost 01
L#1 DoublesColleen Begg / Jenny Eddinger vs Leigh Tobin / Martha Whitty2-6, 1-6
2025-06-14vs Whitty - Bold StrokesWon 10
W#1 SinglesChristine Hammann vs Sarah London7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Baltimore Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.81
Christine Hammann
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.66
Bernadette Burger
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.65
Julie Knight
published
2.58
Colleen Begg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.55
Seema Iyer
published
2.54
Ronni Wexler
published
2.52
Gail Lawson
published
2.41
Jenn McLean
published
2.31
Sheree Raschid
published
Jenny Eddinger
published
Patrice Holtz
published
Sheri Mazurkevich
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Colleen Begg + Christine Hammann123 matchesnot enough data
Ronni Wexler + Seema Iyer033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Christine Hammann
84W–47L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Bernadette Burger
56W–70L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
Julie Knight
29W–42L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Colleen Begg
35W–40L career · 4 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
2.58
Seema Iyer
3W–16L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Ronni Wexler
6W–16L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
Gail Lawson
2W–14L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
2.52
Jenn McLean
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.41
Sheree Raschid
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
2.31
Jenny Eddinger
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patrice Holtz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sheri Mazurkevich
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.