Teams

Loosely Strung

2022 Lynchburg Adult 18 & Over · Lynchburg Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.86 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-20vs Oakwood AllianceWon 10
W#3 DoublesAnnmarie Hutchison / Carrington Neel vs Elizabeth Kettinger / Grace Petty6-2, 6-0
2022-06-15vs TerminettersWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnnmarie Hutchison / Becky Giles vs Denise Jackson / Shayla Foster6-2, 6-3
2022-06-11vs TerminettersWon 10
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Gill / Annmarie Hutchison vs Rachel Love / Shayla Foster6-2, 6-3
2022-06-09vs Oakwood AllianceWon 10
W#3 DoublesMary Stuart Battle / Annmarie Hutchison vs Terri Proffitt / Nicole Allen6-0, 6-2
2022-06-04vs Oakwood AllianceWon 10
W#1 DoublesElla Grace Anderson / Annmarie Hutchison vs Nicole Allen / Terri Proffitt6-2, 6-1
2022-05-18vs Oakwood AllianceWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnnmarie Hutchison / Carrington Neel vs Maria Roberts / Kersten Morrison6-1, 6-1
2022-05-11vs Nothing To LoseWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnnmarie Hutchison / Carrington Neel vs Pascale Renald / Tina Roberts-Reid6-0, 6-3
2022-05-02vs TerminettersWon 10
W#2 DoublesGrey Adams / Annmarie Hutchison vs Allison Rakos / Katherine French6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Lynchburg Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Mary Stuart Battle
published
3.85
Carla Workman
published 4
3.79
Gretchen Perkins
published 3.5
3.75
Cheryl Betz
published 4
Anna Klein
published 4
3.72
Lory Sibcy
published
3.70
Joy Rochow
published
3.56
Grey Adams
published 3.5
3.55
Annmarie Hutchison
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.54
Becky Giles
published 4
3.46
Wendy Counts
published
Teresa Antonelli
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Stuart Battle + Joy Rochow4257% games+1.9% vs expected
Wendy Counts + Grey Adams4158% games+1.1% vs expected
Cheryl Betz + Lory Sibcy303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Stuart Battle
11W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Carla Workman
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
3.5
Gretchen Perkins
11W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%1%99%
3.79
4
Cheryl Betz
21W–10L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Anna Klein
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lory Sibcy
17W–5L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
Joy Rochow
11W–5L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.70
3.5
Grey Adams
16W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%32%68%
3.56
4
Annmarie Hutchison
33W–42L career · 8 lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.55
4
Becky Giles
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
Wendy Counts
9W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.46
Teresa Antonelli
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.