Teams

Olson/Nashville

2026 Adult 55 & Over - Nashville · 4.0 Men - Saturday Daytime

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-05-02vs Swann/Oubre/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesDan Ostrander / Paul Peterson vs Will Hughes / Jun Qian6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMatt Holm / Jeff Gaw vs Christopher Oubre / Jeff Tisherman6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJay Olson / Douglas McLaughlin vs Scott Swann / William Jones3-6, 3-6
2026-04-11vs Swann/Oubre/NashvilleWon 20
W#2 DoublesJames Demouy / Jay Olson vs Christopher Oubre / Jeff Tisherman6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGlenn Kiger / Joseph McComb vs Scott Swann / Stephen Hodges6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2026-03-21vs Swann/Oubre/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesJames Demouy / Jeff Gaw vs Will Hughes / Jun Qian6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDouglas McLaughlin / Matt Holm vs Scott Swann / Stephen Tanner6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTony Lance / Paul Peterson vs Jeff Tisherman / Takayuki Niikura4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men - Saturday Daytime have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Dan Ostrander
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Jeff Gaw
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.82
James Demouy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.78
Douglas McLaughlin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.78
Joseph McComb
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Tony Lance
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Stephen Levet
published
3.54
Jay Olson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Glenn Kiger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Matt Holm
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dan Ostrander
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.88
Jeff Gaw
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
James Demouy
22W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.82
Douglas McLaughlin
5W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
Joseph McComb
6W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
Tony Lance
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
Stephen Levet
11W–2L career · no lines in 2026
9%89%1%
3.69
Jay Olson
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.54
Glenn Kiger
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Matt Holm
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.