Teams

Beattie 4.0 55+

2026 Spring 55 & Over 3.0 - 4.0, 9.0 · 4.0 Adult 55 Women

8 players · average NTRP / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-25vs SH - GarrisonLost 02
L#1 DoublesShelia Brumbalow / Jana Melton vs Sharon Garrison / Jana Killen1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSandra Kirk / Tracey Marcu vs Diana McCutcheon / Tonya Shelton2-6, 3-6
2026-03-21vs SH - GarrisonLost 03
L#1 DoublesDonna Garner / Melissa Coldiron vs Peggy Claiborne / Melissa Young1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesStacy Mason / Sabrina Eddins vs Sharon Garrison / Donna Barksdale1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSandra Kirk / Tracey Marcu vs Cynthia Fennel / Tonya Shelton2-6, 1-6
2026-03-14vs SH - GarrisonLost 03
L#1 DoublesMelissa Coldiron / Sabrina Eddins vs Peggy Claiborne / Melissa Young7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJana Melton / Tracey Marcu vs Cynthia Fennel / Jana Killen2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesSandra Kirk / Stacy Mason vs Sharon Garrison / Diana McCutcheon3-6, 0-6
2026-03-03vs SH - GarrisonLost 03
L#1 DoublesMelissa Coldiron / Sandra Kirk vs Jana Killen / Donna Barksdale1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesShelia Brumbalow / Jana Melton vs Sharon Garrison / Cynthia Fennel0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDonna Garner / Stacy Mason vs Diana McCutcheon / Tonya Shelton2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 4.0 Adult 55 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Beattie 4.0 55+0401224147

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Melissa Coldiron
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Donna Garner
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.03
Tracey Marcu
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Jana Melton
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.82
Sabrina Eddins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.81
Sandra Kirk
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Dina Beattie
published
Shelia Brumbalow
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jana Melton + Tracey Marcu4261% gamesnot enough data
Shelia Brumbalow + Jana Melton0519% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa Coldiron
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Donna Garner
8W–23L career · 6 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.15
Tracey Marcu
30W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.03
Jana Melton
44W–29L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
Sabrina Eddins
3W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Sandra Kirk
9W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.81
Dina Beattie
5W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Shelia Brumbalow
0W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.