Teams

Holley - Mixed Vibes

2026 Hampton Roads Tri-Level Mixed · Hampton Roads Tri-Level Mixed 4.5, 4.0, 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-26vs Beauty & The Beast - McClungLost 01
L#3 DoublesCourtney Kellam / Matthew Dey vs Matthew Mazzoni / Claire Walters4-6, 2-6
2026-08-24vs Sweitzer - RacquetshipLost 12
L#1 DoublesRycy Godette / John Patrick Gallagher vs James Bracey / Zoe Fraser2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Bell / Miguel Sierra vs David Nekoumand / Claire Walters3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMarcus Robinson / Laura Smith vs Janice Sabio / Renald Castro5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2026-08-19vs Beauty & The Beast - McClungWon 10
W#2 DoublesTammy Willett / Matthew Dey vs Ajay Trivedi / Angelica Suciu6-0, 6-4
2026-08-17vs Sweitzer - RacquetshipLost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn Patrick Gallagher / Courtney Violette vs Debby Levi / James Bracey1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTessa Robinson / Miguel Sierra vs Tijen Ireland / Rogelio Valdez7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAllison Lavigne / Matthew Dey vs Janice Sabio / Steven Nohe3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Hampton Roads Tri-Level Mixed 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Courtney Violette
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.01
Rycy Godette
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
Tessa Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Andre Rogers
published 4
3.62
Matthew Dey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.62
Noah Dobrinsky
published
3.50
Jessica Simpson
published
3.49
Marcus Robinson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Erin Camden
published 3.5
2.97
Allison Lavigne
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
John Chandler
published
John Patrick Gallagher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Miguel Sierra
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Samuel Holley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rycy Godette + Matthew Dey303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Courtney Violette
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%3%
4.26
Rycy Godette
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
47%53%<1%
4.01
Tessa Robinson
12W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Andre Rogers
3W–10L career · no lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.71
Matthew Dey
36W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.62
Noah Dobrinsky
14W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.62
Jessica Simpson
9W–3L career · no lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.50
Marcus Robinson
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
Erin Camden
141W–91L career · no lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.35
3
Allison Lavigne
5W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.97
John Chandler
6W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
John Patrick Gallagher
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Miguel Sierra
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Samuel Holley
16W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.