Teams

Summergrove - Edmonds-Porch

2023 SCTA Winter '22'23 - USTA Adult 18 & Over · Weekday Women 4.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.58 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Weekday Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Mary Knight
published
3.86
Lura Hammock
published
3.84
Joy Cliche
published
3.77
Tammy Porch
published
Deidre Jones
published 4
3.67
Janelle Bohan
published
3.61
Vanessa Blake
published
3.60
Dawn Stiehl
published 3.5
3.59
Aleisa Bayne
published 3.5
3.48
Angela Galusha
published 3.5
3.48
Victoria Serapiglia
published
3.32
Lisa Wettstein
published
3.27
Bobbie Kicklighter
published 3.5
Betsy Campbell
published 3.5
3.23
Lesli O'Neill
published
Linda Edmonds
published
Lori Shrader
published
Margarette Coleman
published
Theresa Geise
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joy Cliche + Vanessa Blake5258% games+4.2% vs expected
Joy Cliche + Lura Hammock24955% games+3.4% vs expected
Dawn Stiehl + Angela Galusha4451% games−1.6% vs expected
Lesli O'Neill + Lisa Wettstein2445% gamesnot enough data
Joy Cliche + Janelle Bohan314 matchesnot enough data
Aleisa Bayne + Victoria Serapiglia314 matchesnot enough data
Mary Knight + Deidre Jones404 matchesnot enough data
Vanessa Blake + Victoria Serapiglia314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Knight
48W–29L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.92
Lura Hammock
37W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.86
Joy Cliche
68W–31L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.84
Tammy Porch
24W–13L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Deidre Jones
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Janelle Bohan
52W–29L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.67
Vanessa Blake
36W–26L career · no lines in 2023
<1%22%78%
3.61
3.5
Dawn Stiehl
53W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%24%76%
3.60
3.5
Aleisa Bayne
23W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%25%75%
3.59
3.5
Angela Galusha
40W–27L career · no lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
3.48
Victoria Serapiglia
52W–26L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.48
Lisa Wettstein
18W–29L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Bobbie Kicklighter
10W–17L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Betsy Campbell
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lesli O'Neill
25W–27L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Linda Edmonds
15W–20L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lori Shrader
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Margarette Coleman
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Theresa Geise
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.