Teams

Howell/Con/CTC

2026 Combo 40 & Over 6.5, 8.5 · 6.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-31vs WittenbergSplit 11
L#1 DoublesHolly Ann Herzfeld-Van Dyke / Amber Talley vs Kristin Connell / Rachel Wayne5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMelissa Oates / Leslie Lamb vs Lindsey Wittenberg / Molly Humphries7-5, 6-3
2026-08-27vs Baker/DGarretson/LR/BPWon 30
W#1 DoublesKisha Boston / Jennifer Simmons vs Mandy Meek / Rebecca Foster6-6
W#2 DoublesHolly Ann Herzfeld-Van Dyke / Caroline Howse vs Allison Baker / Timbre Downey6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesHannah Howell / Robbin Miller vs Sonjia Loftis / Stephanie Bittle3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Hannah Howell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Melissa Oates
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Amber Talley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Leslie Lamb
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Susan Curtis
published
2.93
Elly Rumbach
published 3
2.89
Kisha Boston
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Holly Ann Herzfeld-Van Dyke
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.59
Robbin Miller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Simmons
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Holly Ann Herzfeld-Van Dyke + Leslie Lamb6556% games+0.1% vs expected
Leslie Lamb + Robbin Miller2350% games−3.1% vs expected
Elly Rumbach + Melissa Oates134 matchesnot enough data
Elly Rumbach + Kisha Boston213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Hannah Howell
10W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.66
Melissa Oates
39W–43L career · 1 line in 2026
3%95%2%
3.25
3.5
Amber Talley
23W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
5%93%1%
3.21
Leslie Lamb
24W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%52%48%
2.99
Susan Curtis
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.97
3
Elly Rumbach
50W–36L career · no lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
Kisha Boston
25W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.89
3
Holly Ann Herzfeld-Van Dyke
16W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
2.78
Robbin Miller
15W–32L career · 1 line in 2026
25%75%<1%
2.59
Jennifer Simmons
5W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.