Teams

Olsen

2026 Auburn USTA 18 & Over Combo · 5.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-27vs Van AllenLost 12
W#1 DoublesPaige Ellison-Smith / Hakyung Jin vs Caitlyn Parrish / Lauren Latham0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGriffin Allen / Soyoung Lim vs Beth Hoven / Amy van Allen3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGrace Childress / Shakela Johnson vs Sara Caldwell / Bethany Durden2-6, 0-6
2026-08-20vs Van AllenLost 03
L#1 DoublesMonika Kolwaite / Soyoung Lim vs Madison Coleman / Alina Samolesky1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesGriffin Allen / Hakyung Jin vs Bethany Durden / Macy Campbell2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Stephens / Shakela Johnson vs Caitlyn Parrish / Sylvia Hood1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 5.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Van Allen1030012
2Olsen0103636

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.25 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.53
Griffin Allen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Paige Ellison-Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Monika Kolwaite
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.37
Kwangmi Lee
published
2.24
Ryan Terry
published
2.23
Stephanie Olsen
published
2.19
Hakyung Jin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.04
Shakela Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
1.70
Grace Childress
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Stephens
published
Soyoung Lim
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shakela Johnson + Grace Childress033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Griffin Allen
11W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%43%57%
2.53
Paige Ellison-Smith
3W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.49
Monika Kolwaite
7W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
0%57%43%
2.48
Kwangmi Lee
7W–5L career · no lines in 2026
0%82%18%
2.37
Ryan Terry
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
Stephanie Olsen
7W–14L career · no lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.23
Hakyung Jin
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Shakela Johnson
8W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Grace Childress
0W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.70
Jennifer Stephens
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Soyoung Lim
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.