Teams

Richards/40's/4.0/PAC Night

2026 Man · Cov Adult 40 & Over - Women Night

13 players · average NTRP 3.90 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-02Lost 02
L#1 SinglesPaula Santos vs Deneen Neitzschman4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Fell / Kim Durr vs Stephanie Rolling / Cherie Pausina4-6, 4-6
2026-02-26Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKim Durr / Hali Toups vs Dawn Ledet / Windy Montecino7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-02-23Lost 01
L#2 DoublesApril Luscy / Paula Santos vs Charlotte Scott / Carolyn Kalman1-6, 3-6
2026-02-21Split 11
W#1 SinglesPaula Santos vs Michaela Franklin2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKathryn Mount / Hali Toups vs Julie Oubre / Shelley Sisson5-7, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Cov Adult 40 & Over - Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Amy Burdette
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.78
Hali Toups
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.55
April Luscy
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.52
Becky Richards
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.19
Ann Boucher
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Kathryn Mount
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kim Durr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kourtney Kentzel
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lynette Blossman
usually #2 Doubles 58%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Marta Brasseaux
usually #3 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Michelle Otillio
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
Patricia Schultz
usually #1 Doubles 61%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
Paula Santos
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

April Luscy + Patricia Schultz5169% gamesnot enough data
April Luscy + Marta Brasseaux3349% gamesnot enough data
Becky Richards + Hali Toups033 matchesnot enough data
Amy Burdette + Lynette Blossman123 matchesnot enough data
Lynette Blossman + Patricia Schultz213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Burdette
30W–14L career · 27 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Hali Toups
1W–6L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.78
4
April Luscy
22W–20L career · 14 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.55
4
Becky Richards
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.52
3.5
Ann Boucher
12W–7L career · 12 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
Kathryn Mount
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Kim Durr
8W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kourtney Kentzel
17W–5L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lynette Blossman
13W–14L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marta Brasseaux
19W–16L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michelle Otillio
11W–7L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data
Patricia Schultz
25W–11L career · 18 lines in 2026
not enough data
Paula Santos
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.