Teams

Lacy/Memphis

2026 Combo 18 & Over - Memphis · 6.5 18 & Over Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.17 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-08-16vs Kinney/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesAshley Bush / Jennifer Carstensen vs Jennifer Green / Morgan Burton6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSusan Northen-Lacy / Deepa Nair vs Trisha Dooley / Jodi Kendall4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesTracy Pope / Amasa Lacy vs Kate Linebarger / Candi McMorran6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Bradi Bair
published 3.5
3.32
Jennifer Carstensen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Maggie Bechtel
published
3.25
Melinda Hoehn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Emily Papineau
published
3.14
3.08
Ping Zhou
published
2.95
Tracy Pope
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Amasa Lacy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Susan Northen-Lacy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Deepa Nair
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.59
Makenzie Perkins
published
2.49
Leslie Barton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melinda Hoehn + Tracy Pope81049% games+3.0% vs expected
Susan Northen-Lacy + Bradi Bair5254% games+0.4% vs expected
Susan Northen-Lacy + Ping Zhou2349% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bradi Bair
29W–17L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.36
Jennifer Carstensen
30W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Maggie Bechtel
8W–7L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Melinda Hoehn
15W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.25
Emily Papineau
25W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.21
Maricela Robles-Murguia
24W–17L career · no lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.14
Ping Zhou
23W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.08
Tracy Pope
23W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Amasa Lacy
29W–32L career · 1 line in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
Susan Northen-Lacy
21W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
1%87%12%
2.83
3
Deepa Nair
22W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Makenzie Perkins
11W–10L career · no lines in 2026
25%74%<1%
2.59
Leslie Barton
15W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%53%47%
2.49

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.