Teams

LAHaigney-Jetton

2022 Lake Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Women 7.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-09-29vs LMKPortaro-McRorie/JettonLost 02
L#2 DoublesRhonda Wood / Jane Heredia vs Sharon McAfee / Megan Brown4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNaila Campbell / Aimee Downing vs Jenny Yaudes / Andrea McRorie6-7, 2-6
2022-09-19vs SClancy/EdgemoorSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKristine Bienstock / Dina White vs Karen Allison / Annie Edenfield6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesAlison Cossar / Jane Heredia vs Stephanie Clancy / Lisa Smith5-7, 3-6
2022-09-14vs LCBogojevich/CSDLost 02
L#1 DoublesDina White / Kristine Bienstock vs Jennie Carruth / Kathy Ciambotti3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJane Heredia / Alison Cossar vs Jennifer Joiner / Samantha Warren6-7, 4-6
2022-09-13vs LDScripter/EdgemoorLost 03
L#1 DoublesKristine Bienstock / Dina White vs Keri Norcross / Caroline Ray4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Haigney / Kimberly Haigney vs Annie Perrino / MaryGwen Murash3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMandy Alexander / Jane Heredia vs Darlene Scripter / Leah Russell1-6, 2-6
2022-09-12vs LCBogojevich/CSDLost 03
L#1 DoublesAimee Downing / Naila Campbell vs Paige Mcguirk / Victoria Peaire6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKimberly Haigney / Karen Haigney vs Elizabeth Foreman / Jacquie Wheeler6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJane Heredia / Rhonda Wood vs Trish Behnke / Barbara King4-6, 1-6
2022-08-31vs LTUtz/River RunSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKaren Haigney / Alison Cossar vs Stephanie Nixdorf / Jann Debord3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesDina White / Kristine Bienstock vs Karen Edge / Ana Endsjo7-6, 6-3
2022-08-29vs LSDavis/JettonLost 02
L#1 DoublesKimberly Haigney / Karen Haigney vs Karen Hallman / Brenda Martinez3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJodith Davis / Kristine Bienstock vs Lauren Hession / Margaret Vermillion2-6, 1-6
2022-08-22vs LTUtz/River RunSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNaila Campbell / Aimee Downing vs Dawn Bush / Kimberly Robbins1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJane Heredia / Rhonda Wood vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Kimberly Haigney
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.63
Kristine Bienstock
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.53
Naila Campbell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.48
Dina White
published 3.5
3.43
Tracey McKenna
published
3.34
Aimee Downing
published 3.5
3.28
Karen Haigney
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Jane Heredia
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.12
Elizabeth Norton
published 3.5
2.81
Sheryl Chapman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Heredia + Karen Haigney5949% games−6.7% vs expected
Karen Haigney + Kimberly Haigney033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kimberly Haigney
49W–33L career · 9 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Kristine Bienstock
62W–70L career · 5 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
Naila Campbell
90W–72L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Dina White
20W–12L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
3.48
Tracey McKenna
12W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Aimee Downing
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Karen Haigney
66W–103L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Jane Heredia
134W–122L career · 6 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Elizabeth Norton
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
18%81%<1%
3.12
Sheryl Chapman
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
93%7%<1%
2.81

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.