Teams

Mukushi

2024 Anne Arundel Singles · Anne Arundel Singles 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.06 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-11-07vs Lady BreakersWon 21
L#1 SinglesErin McVeigh vs Aklil Getachew1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesLorra Baker vs DIANE CASANOVA7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesJasmine Miles vs Gina Telegadas0-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-11-03Won 30
W#1 SinglesErin Weller vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesJasmine Beasley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesAllie Hildebrand vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-10-24vs Lady BreakersLost 03
L#1 SinglesLorra Baker vs Kelly Kennedy0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesCortney Mukushi vs Heather Nesti1-6, 6-7
L#3 SinglesErin Weller vs Gina Telegadas2-6, 4-6
2024-10-19vs Lady BreakersWon 10
W#1 SinglesErin Weller vs Grace Tran7-5, 6-1
2024-10-10vs BaldwinLost 12
W#1 SinglesCortney Mukushi vs Jennifer Baldwin6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesLorra Baker vs Giovanna Schummer6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesJasmine Miles vs Alexandra Bray1-6, 2-6
2024-10-07vs LewandowskiLost 03
L#1 SinglesErin McVeigh vs Aine McKee3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesAllie Hildebrand vs Janelle Burleigh2-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesJasmine Miles vs Paige Wagner2-6, 0-6
2024-10-05vs BaldwinWon 20
W#2 SinglesErin McVeigh vs Jennifer Timian6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesCortney Mukushi vs Lorayne Constant6-4, 6-3
2024-09-15vs BaldwinWon 20
W#2 SinglesAllie Hildebrand vs Jennifer Timian6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesLaura Mitsopoulos vs Lorayne Constant6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2024-09-14vs LewandowskiLost 12
L#1 SinglesErin Weller vs Colleen Quinlan1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesCortney Mukushi vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 SinglesJasmine Beasley vs Pamela Nieva4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Allie Hildebrand
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Erin McVeigh
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
2.88
Cortney Mukushi
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3
2.85
Erin Weller
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3
2.80
Lorra Baker
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.72
Jasmine Beasley
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.68
Jasmine Miles
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.48
Laura Mitsopoulos
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Allie Hildebrand
47W–31L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Erin McVeigh
101W–83L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.34
3
Cortney Mukushi
59W–84L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Erin Weller
41W–50L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%86%14%
2.85
3
Lorra Baker
102W–160L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Jasmine Beasley
49W–51L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%92%2%
2.72
3
Jasmine Miles
43W–55L career · 3 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
2.5
Laura Mitsopoulos
29W–19L career · 1 line in 2024
0%57%43%
2.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.