Teams

RR BASS

2026 FW Ladies 55 & Over winter · Fri 7.0 Ladies

12 players · average NTRP 3.30 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-02-13vs ATC MERCERLost 03
L#1 DoublesKimberly Juneau / Linda Lapointe vs Kista Stahl / Dana McClendon3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJulie Conant / Lana Doggett vs Charlcye Brueggemeyer / Tisha Mercer2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSandra Owens / Dianne Dugan vs Marla Westbrook / Kim Cleary0-3
2026-02-11vs ATC VARGHESELost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Berry / Lana Doggett vs Linda Stumpff / Suhna Pierce6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNancy Lumbra / Sandra Owens vs Lesia Allen / Lori Ruehle6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKimberly Juneau / Julie Conant vs Irene Luna / Elizabeth Varghese1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-02-09vs ATC GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesLana Doggett / Kimberly Juneau vs Sybille Dejonge / Diane Alfino4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Berry / Linda Lapointe vs Monique ROBINSON / Kami Wallace6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnita Zimmerman / Nancy Lumbra vs Cass Weyandt / Kim Bell4-6, 3-6
2026-02-06vs WAG ANDERSONLost 12
W#1 DoublesSusan Berry / Lana Doggett vs Cary Crawford / Holley Radican6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSandra Owens / Julie Conant vs Sandra Anderson / Lori Williams4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDianne Dugan / Anita Zimmerman vs Carolyn Rini / Elizabeth Fernandez5-7, 4-6
2026-01-16vs SOAKS BOYDLost 02
L#1 DoublesLana Doggett / Dee Tarver vs Gracie Santana / Terri Wren5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Lumbra / Julie Conant vs Debbie Boyd / Angela Rosenbaum6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2026-01-09vs BIR MAGGILost 03
L#1 DoublesLana Doggett / Dee Tarver vs Marcela Romero / Beau Bone5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Conant / Heidi Mireiter vs Karen Maggi / Preeti Rangee2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDeborah Iverson / Linda Lapointe vs Laura Church / Patty Hart6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2025-12-19vs BIR HOLT/THOMPSONLost 03
L#1 DoublesDee Tarver / Sandra Owens vs Danielle Woods / Kim Thompson1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Conant / Nancy Lumbra vs Laura Spears / Kimberly Blakey4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDeborah Iverson / Anita Zimmerman vs Kimberly Holt / Melissa Laymance3-6, 2-6
2025-12-12vs STC ZAVASKYLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Berry / Dee Tarver vs Summer Richbourg / April Schultz6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNancy Lumbra / Sandra Owens vs Kiz Costin / Debbie Greenwood3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKimberly Juneau / Linda Lapointe vs Judy Zavasky / Alison Morris1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fri 7.0 Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Deborah Iverson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Heidi Mireiter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Dee Tarver
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Lana Doggett
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.08
Anita Zimmerman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Kimberly Juneau
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.94
Linda Lapointe
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.88
Catherine Bass
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Dianne Dugan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Nancy Lumbra
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Julie Conant
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Susan Berry
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anita Zimmerman + Dianne Dugan2343% gamesnot enough data
Anita Zimmerman + Lana Doggett123 matchesnot enough data
Lana Doggett + Linda Lapointe123 matchesnot enough data
Lana Doggett + Dee Tarver123 matchesnot enough data
Lana Doggett + Susan Berry213 matchesnot enough data
Linda Lapointe + Susan Berry213 matchesnot enough data
Dee Tarver + Susan Berry033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Deborah Iverson
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Heidi Mireiter
8W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Dee Tarver
4W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.13
Lana Doggett
12W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Anita Zimmerman
8W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%72%<1%
3.08
Kimberly Juneau
3W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.06
Linda Lapointe
48W–51L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Catherine Bass
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Dianne Dugan
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nancy Lumbra
12W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Julie Conant
3W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Berry
11W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.