Teams

UPTA40A/Studebaker/Kroc

2025 UPTA Adult 40 & Over - USTA · 40+ Adult Women - 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 2.90 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-31vs UPTA40A/Zeimetz/PavilionLost 14
W#1 DoublesRebekah Axson / Alison Meagher vs Cady Johnson / Elizabeth Faulkner6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAnna Pretulak vs Lara Knight3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBrooks Ferguson / Mary Duff Rayneri vs Deb Dujardin / Dell Pulliam1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAlice Izzard / Rebekah Fedrowitz vs Claudia Kornaros / Shelly James2-6, 5-7
L#4 DoublesCaroline Smoak / Melissa Studebaker vs Lora Henderson / Blair Zeimetz3-6, 0-6
2025-03-17vs UPTA40A/Golden/BrookstoneLost 14
L#1 DoublesBrooks Ferguson / Meg Riley vs Paige Botts / TRINA NEGRI7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAnna Pretulak vs Karina Scholten6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Duff Rayneri / Bronwen Greene vs Julie Gibson / Leah Winton3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMaryn Canniff / Melissa Studebaker vs Deborah B Bowyer / Carolyn Hassey2-6, 3-6
L#4 DoublesCaroline Smoak / Heather Ware vs Starr Wimberly / Kelley Golden6-7, 3-6
2025-03-10vs UPTA40A/Sellers-Koch/GCCWon 31
W#1 DoublesMary Duff Rayneri / Caroline Smoak vs Kasey Frank / Leslie Ingram6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRebekah Axson / Anna Pretulak vs Laurie Koch / Jamie Bach6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesHeather Ware / Meg Riley vs Kristen Patel / Kelly Geist1-6, 2-6
W#4 DoublesMelissa Studebaker / Maryn Canniff vs Karen Akerhielm / Kelley Norris6-3, 7-5
2025-03-03vs UPTA40A/Reed/GCCWon 41
W#1 DoublesAnna Pretulak / Rebekah Axson vs Rhonda Riley / Jennifer Infinger7-5, 7-6
W#1 SinglesShellie Corley vs Barbara Merline6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBrooks Ferguson / Meg Riley vs Stacey Bradshaw / Emily Davis6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAlice Izzard / Mary Duff Rayneri vs Elizabeth Einstein / Susan Reed1-6, 1-6
W#4 DoublesBronwen Greene / Melissa Studebaker vs Virginia Sherman / Sally Russell6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40+ Adult Women - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Alison Meagher
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.86
Anna Pretulak
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.84
Rebekah Axson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.74
Meg Riley
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.66
Rebekah Fedrowitz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Bronwen Greene
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.56
Alice Izzard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.37
Melissa Studebaker
usually #4 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Caroline Smoak
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.18
Heather Ware
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
2.15
Mary Duff Rayneri
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.09
Maryn Canniff
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Shellie Corley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bronwen Greene + Mary Duff Rayneri2351% games+12.8% vs expected
Anna Pretulak + Rebekah Axson5164% games+9.2% vs expected
Maryn Canniff + Melissa Studebaker3742% games+8.4% vs expected
Alison Meagher + Rebekah Axson3350% gamesnot enough data
Bronwen Greene + Rebekah Fedrowitz4160% gamesnot enough data
Heather Ware + Caroline Smoak134 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Studebaker + Bronwen Greene314 matchesnot enough data
Alison Meagher + Anna Pretulak123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alison Meagher
16W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.87
3
Anna Pretulak
18W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
2.86
Rebekah Axson
13W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Meg Riley
15W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.74
Rebekah Fedrowitz
10W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Bronwen Greene
22W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
3
Alice Izzard
7W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
34%65%<1%
2.56
Melissa Studebaker
26W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%83%17%
2.37
2.5
Caroline Smoak
7W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Heather Ware
9W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
Mary Duff Rayneri
11W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.15
Maryn Canniff
23W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Shellie Corley
20W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.