Teams

SH-Garrison

2023 Combo 55 & Over · 7.5 Adult 55 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.88 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 7.5 Adult 55 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Daphne Jones
published 4
3.65
Sharon Garrison
published
3.53
Cynthia Fennel
published 4
3.37
Jana Killen
published
3.34
Diana McCutcheon
published 4
3.34
Elizabeth Weiland
published
3.23
Connie Powell
published 3.5
3.03
Tracey Marcu
published
2.74
Lynette Horton
published
2.69
Melanie Hawk
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cynthia Fennel + Sharon Garrison19663% games+13.8% vs expected
Diana McCutcheon + Cynthia Fennel6254% games+9.6% vs expected
Jana Killen + Sharon Garrison6165% games+1.7% vs expected
Tracey Marcu + Sharon Garrison9455% games−7.5% vs expected
Lynette Horton + Cynthia Fennel3545% games−10.8% vs expected
Jana Killen + Cynthia Fennel404 matchesnot enough data
Diana McCutcheon + Sharon Garrison303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Daphne Jones
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sharon Garrison
103W–27L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.65
4
Cynthia Fennel
52W–23L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.53
Jana Killen
55W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.37
4
Diana McCutcheon
30W–29L career · no lines in 2023
88%12%<1%
3.34
Elizabeth Weiland
49W–31L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Connie Powell
30W–16L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Tracey Marcu
30W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%40%60%
3.03
Lynette Horton
15W–16L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
2.74
Melanie Hawk
27W–19L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.