Teams

Rockledge - Zavaleta

2026 Brevard Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.90 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-19vs Kiwi - HertzogWon 30
W#1 DoublesElliott Hulscher / Rich HOGARTH vs Chad McCall / David Norris6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChristian Maldonado / Mathew Deater vs Ron Dulay / John Reeder6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAlejandro Carazo / Brian Tran vs Tony Famiano / Michael Carpenter6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2026-08-05vs Fee - CortezWon 30
W#1 DoublesElliott Hulscher / Rich HOGARTH vs Ricardo Cortez / James Pretorius6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesElliott Hogans / Mathew Deater vs Jean Arnaud / Anilgowthamkumar Geddam7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChristian Maldonado / Robert Bielling vs Matthew Scott / Isaac Vergara6-0, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Elliott Hulscher
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Christian Maldonado
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.71
Elliott Hogans
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Isidro Zavaleta
published
3.63
Alejandro Carazo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.48
Tareque Liaquat
published
3.37
Rich HOGARTH
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
James Combs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Brian Tran
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Robert Bielling
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Jay Amburgey
published
3.08
Mathew Deater
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elliott Hogans + Elliott Hulscher3546% gamesnot enough data
Rich HOGARTH + Mathew Deater303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elliott Hulscher
89W–52L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%12%
3.83
4
Christian Maldonado
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Elliott Hogans
139W–73L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Isidro Zavaleta
9W–13L career · no lines in 2026
13%87%1%
3.66
4
Alejandro Carazo
4W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.63
Tareque Liaquat
6W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.48
Rich HOGARTH
11W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.37
James Combs
13W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
86%14%<1%
3.35
3.5
Brian Tran
40W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Robert Bielling
22W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.32
Jay Amburgey
13W–11L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.23
Mathew Deater
23W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.