Teams

EE:Feist

2024 VT Tri-Level Men · 4.0 Men

2 players · average NTRP / VERMONT

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-10vs ESB:MatosWon 10
W#1 DoublesThomas Feist / Bradford Brainard vs Colin Keech / Bruce Williams6-2, 6-3
2024-10-23vs ESB:NY EMPIRE:RacineLost 01
L#1 DoublesThomas Feist / Mark Stephenson vs Bruce Beckstead / Richard Gottschall2-6, 3-6
2024-10-01vs ESB:NY EMPIRE:RacineLost 01
L#1 DoublesThomas Feist / Mark Stephenson vs Pranav Krishna / Michael Racine4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-09-24vs ESB:MatosLost 01
L#1 DoublesThomas Feist / Bradford Brainard vs Ryan Matos / Ben Nappi3-6, 4-6
2024-09-19vs BTC:Call to Serve:KnickerbockerLost 01
L#1 DoublesThomas Feist / John Kassel vs Jerry Knickerbocker / Andrew Murphy1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BTC:Call to Serve:Knickerbocker8080139
2ESB:NY EMPIRE:Racine4343757
3EE:Feist25251173
4ESB:Matos16161277

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Thomas Feist
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
John Kassel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thomas Feist + John Kassel123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thomas Feist
9W–31L career · 5 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
John Kassel
10W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.