Teams

SFV Toluca Lake Swans

SFV-Adult 40 & Over · SFV - Women 4.0 Weekend

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#1 DoublesLena Bouton / Debie Marsden vs Bridget Thordarson / Paula Jo Rivera6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHoury Nadjarian / Nickie Huai vs Alona Kavinoky / Jill Koenig4-3
2021-08-06vs SFV String 'Em AlongWon 10
W#1 DoublesLena Bouton / Parisa Talebian vs Mardie Villadiego / Chris Yuwakittisit7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesLena Bouton / Parisa Talebian vs Kathrina Cruz / Deborah McGaughey3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAparna Bhargava vs Robin Hittelman6-7, 2-6
2021-06-26vs SFV Double BreakersWon 10
W#1 SinglesNickie Huai vs Vicki Levin6-4, 6-2
2021-06-06vs SFV Team AdeSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLena Bouton / Debie Marsden vs Rebecca Escandon / Lorene Miller6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKarin Hoesli / Aparna Bhargava vs Rosalyn Daniels / Diana Carmichael3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV - Women 4.0 Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Nickie Huai
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.77
Karin Hoesli
published
3.75
Debie Marsden
published 4
3.74
Parisa Talebian
published
3.74
Lena Bouton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Aubrey Karr
published 4
3.43
Kelly Ronanki
published
3.27
Aparna Bhargava
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
Emily Aiken
published 3.5
3.13
Theresa Sterling
published
Lauren Haber
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Parisa Talebian + Karin Hoesli7259% games+8.3% vs expected
Lena Bouton + Aubrey Karr4260% games+6.0% vs expected
Aubrey Karr + Nickie Huai3444% games−5.2% vs expected
Debie Marsden + Karin Hoesli303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Nickie Huai
128W–72L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
Karin Hoesli
13W–5L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Debie Marsden
17W–10L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.75
Parisa Talebian
8W–4L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Lena Bouton
81W–62L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Aubrey Karr
10W–14L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
Kelly Ronanki
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
70%30%<1%
3.43
3.5
Aparna Bhargava
66W–94L career · 2 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Emily Aiken
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Theresa Sterling
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.13
Lauren Haber
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.