Teams

OC Laguna Beach Tennis Academy - Coach Mateljan

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WE - 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-29vs OC Leslie / Xuan -Irvine HP - Sun9Lost 12
W#1 DoublesNathally Cespedes / Debbie Chin vs Xuan Le / Risa Makino6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesKelsey Liss vs Amanda Dang1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesMarcela McKibben vs Judith Beleber4-6, 1-6
2025-06-21vs OC YLCC - Sandra - Sun1Won 30
W#1 DoublesNathally Cespedes / Erin Rudsinski vs Rebecca Budai / Susan Aldrich6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesYuki Kato Maves vs Christina Case7-5, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKelsey Liss vs Susan Leonardi6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-06vs OC Palisades - Drew - Sun2Won 50
W#1 DoublesErin Rudsinski / Nathally Cespedes vs Lori Ratzlaff / Karen Brink2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKelsey Liss vs Cynthia Turner6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAllison Palme / Jesstine Jones vs Zinat Torres / Hellene Thurston4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMarcela McKibben vs Samantha Wang5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDebbie Chin / April Reese vs Heather Bogard / Deborah Kainen6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-05-17vs OC Cinderally - Cerritos - Ji - Sat1Split 22
W#1 DoublesNathally Cespedes / Erin Rudsinski vs Hyemin Lee / Jiwoo Yoon6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMaria Reichel vs Ji Young Han2-6, 3-5
W#2 DoublesYuki Kato Maves / Susan Dedeluk vs Narae Kim / Jacqueline Min6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMarcela McKibben / Allison Palme vs Anna Kim / Sarah Lim2-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesNathally Cespedes / Erin Rudsinski vs Amanda Decarlo / Jen Allert6-0, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMaria Reichel vs Rachel Lee6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJulee Nishimi / April Reese vs Brenda Clark / Kristin Samuelian6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKelsey Liss / Marcela McKibben vs Sophia Hoffman / Diane Liberty6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Jesstine Jones
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Yuki Kato Maves
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.26
Nathally Cespedes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
April Reese
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Debbie Chin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Susan Dedeluk
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Marcela McKibben
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.10
Maria Reichel
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.09
Erin Rudsinski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Allison Palme
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Julee Nishimi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kelsey Liss
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Rudsinski + Nathally Cespedes6450% games+7.5% vs expected
Erin Rudsinski + Marcela McKibben044 matchesnot enough data
Nathally Cespedes + Debbie Chin303 matchesnot enough data
Maria Reichel + Susan Dedeluk123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jesstine Jones
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.50
Yuki Kato Maves
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Nathally Cespedes
15W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
April Reese
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Debbie Chin
9W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Susan Dedeluk
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Marcela McKibben
14W–38L career · 4 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Maria Reichel
6W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Erin Rudsinski
27W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.09
3
Allison Palme
13W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
Julee Nishimi
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kelsey Liss
9W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.