Teams

PVIC - Egan

2025 Duval Trilevel 18 & Over Women - Summer · 4.5

19 players · average NTRP 4.14 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-19vs Williams Y - McGeheeSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Brulte / Sarah-Lynn le Roux vs Cynthia McGehee / Claudia Eikner6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesHeather LaPrade / Jacqueline Bell Egan vs Natasha Senchuk / Kelly Atkins7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2025-08-12vs Mills Field - ForcierSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAlexis Schuchart / Jill Saig vs Marianne Harper / Paula Miller2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJacqueline Bell Egan / Donna Bush vs Jill Jabot / Jennifer Coffindaffer6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-07-29vs Williams Y - McGeheeLost 01
L#1 DoublesMeredith Frisch / Alexis Schuchart vs Anne Billion / Cynthia McGehee5-7, 3-6
2025-07-22vs Mills Field - ForcierWon 21
L#1 DoublesSarah-Lynn le Roux / Suzanne Brulte vs Brooke Stachler Phelps / Cindy Vermut7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJulie van Voorhis / Addison Crenshaw vs Jeralyn Forcier / Cheryl Moody6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesCatherine Harrison / Julie Pippins vs Kerry Cooke / Traunia Senior6-2, 6-1
2025-07-08vs Williams Y - McGeheeLost 01
L#2 DoublesHeather LaPrade / Kathy Parker vs Victoria Li / Raquel Clark3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-07-01vs Mills Field - ForcierLost 02
L#1 DoublesMeredith Frisch / Alexis Schuchart vs Kymberly Kochis / Brooke Stachler Phelps6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAddison Crenshaw / Jacqueline Bell Egan vs Katie Robshaw / Jill Jabot0-6, 3-6
2025-06-17vs Williams Y - McGeheeWon 21
W#1 DoublesSarah-Lynn le Roux / Andrea Griswell - * vs Cynthia McGehee / Stephanie Vihlen6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesHeather LaPrade / Addison Crenshaw vs Katie Deering / Jessica Cummings4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCatherine Harrison / Stephanie Mock vs Jen Bates / Paula Burdash7-6, 6-1
2025-06-10vs Mills Field - ForcierLost 02
L#2 DoublesHeather LaPrade / Donna Bush vs Jill Jabot / Jennifer Coffindaffer1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJan Alley / Catherine Harrison vs Patricia Kozack / Christi Bisson7-5, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.54
Sarah-Lynn le Roux
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.36
Alexis Schuchart
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.10
Jill Saig
published
4.06
Meredith Frisch
published
4.01
Suzanne Brulte
published
3.89
Julie van Voorhis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Jacqueline Bell Egan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.81
Addison Crenshaw
published 4
3.79
Jennifer Cleek
published
3.77
Donna Bush
published
3.77
Heather LaPrade
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Kathy Parker
published
3.75
Catherine Harrison
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Stephanie Mock
published
3.63
Amanda Walling
published 4
3.51
Joann Welborn
published
3.39
Jan Alley
published
Julie Pippins
published
Tracy Streva
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacqueline Bell Egan + Julie van Voorhis5063% games+4.0% vs expected
Jacqueline Bell Egan + Heather LaPrade9852% games+2.1% vs expected
Jacqueline Bell Egan + Joann Welborn2553% gamesnot enough data
Alexis Schuchart + Heather LaPrade1544% gamesnot enough data
Alexis Schuchart + Sarah-Lynn le Roux4162% gamesnot enough data
Joann Welborn + Julie van Voorhis4155% gamesnot enough data
Jacqueline Bell Egan + Catherine Harrison303 matchesnot enough data
Joann Welborn + Heather LaPrade213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Sarah-Lynn le Roux
44W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
4.54
4.5
Alexis Schuchart
49W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
4.36
Jill Saig
35W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
4.10
Meredith Frisch
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
4.06
Suzanne Brulte
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
4.01
Julie van Voorhis
45W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.89
4
Jacqueline Bell Egan
145W–100L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.81
4
Addison Crenshaw
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.81
Jennifer Cleek
18W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
Donna Bush
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Heather LaPrade
101W–76L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Kathy Parker
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Catherine Harrison
14W–9L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Stephanie Mock
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.73
4
Amanda Walling
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
Joann Welborn
50W–46L career · no lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.51
Jan Alley
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Julie Pippins
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tracy Streva
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.