Teams

Andreach-Simmons/Chattanooga

2026 Adult 40 & Over-Chattanooga · 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.44 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-17vs Wilson/ChattanoogaWon 31
L#1 DoublesCourtney Andreach / Paige Mathis vs Sarah Delay / Cathy Palisoc1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesClaire Mcvay vs Lynn Pierce6-4, 3-0
W#2 DoublesCarol Tigar / Rachel Adams vs Amy Weathers / Renee McClanahan5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHannah Davis / Camille Burkley-Wilson vs Angie Cowart / Betsy Wilson6-3, 7-5
2026-05-09vs Miller-White/ChattanoogaWon 30
W#1 DoublesAshley Soni / Claire Mcvay vs Charmaine Kincaid / Jazan Powell6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarol Tigar / Leslie Simmons vs Beth Miller / Vernice White6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPaige Mathis / Camille Burkley-Wilson vs Debra Masdea / Mary Phillips6-0, 6-1
2026-05-02vs Wilson/ChattanoogaWon 21
L#1 DoublesCarol Tigar / Rachel Adams vs Amy Weathers / Lynne Barkeloo6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCourtney Andreach / Leslie Simmons vs Angie Cowart / Michelle Rauch7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesClaire Mcvay / Ashley Soni vs Lynn Pierce / Heather Tuttle7-5, 6-1
2026-04-11vs Miller-White/ChattanoogaWon 31
W#1 DoublesAshley Soni / Claire Mcvay vs Patty Vanvalkinburgh / Jazan Powell6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAshley Sorrow vs Vernice White6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKimberly Rogg / Camille Burkley-Wilson vs Charmaine Kincaid / Beth Miller6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLeslie Simmons / Kim Glascock vs Mary Miller / Debra Masdea6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2026-04-04vs Wilson/ChattanoogaLost 12
L#1 DoublesHannah Davis / Claire Mcvay vs Sarah Delay / Cathy Palisoc4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAshley Soni / Courtney Andreach vs Renee McClanahan / Amy Weathers7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCriss Skinner / Ashley Sorrow vs Betsy Wilson / Angie Cowart1-6, 5-7
2026-03-21vs Miller-White/ChattanoogaWon 21
W#1 DoublesCourtney Andreach / Rachel Adams vs Charmaine Kincaid / Jazan Powell3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHannah Davis / Claire Mcvay vs Mary Anne Kristan / Mary Phillips6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKim Glascock / Kimberly Rogg vs Jessica Carter / Beth Bourgeois6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Courtney Andreach
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.49
Kimberly Rogg
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.36
Carol Tigar
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Ashley Soni
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
Camille Burkley-Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Claire Mcvay
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.13
Criss Skinner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Ashley Sorrow
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.98
Kim Glascock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Carol Hoops
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Camille Burkley-Wilson + Kimberly Rogg123 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Soni + Claire Mcvay303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Courtney Andreach
15W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.55
Kimberly Rogg
11W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Carol Tigar
37W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.36
3.5
Ashley Soni
6W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Camille Burkley-Wilson
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.28
3.5
Claire Mcvay
13W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Criss Skinner
3W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Ashley Sorrow
8W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.99
Kim Glascock
2W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.98
3
Carol Hoops
0W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.