Teams

Kris Shelor

2023 Forty West Adult 55 & Over · Forty West 55+ 8.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.70 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-07-22vs Pam BakerWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Robinson / Kristina Shelor vs Pamela Baker / Eva Simmons-O'Brien6-0, 6-2
2023-07-19vs Pam BakerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesFrances Sauer / Nancy van Winter vs Geraldine Klauber / Eva Simmons-O'Brien3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBonnie Keating / Terri Mrozinski vs Marcella Miller / Patricia Stavros6-3, 6-4
2023-07-15vs Pam BakerLost 01
L#2 DoublesTracey Crawford / Terri Mrozinski vs Susan Sibol / Patricia Stavros2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-07-12vs Pam BakerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesHedy Brandt / Nancy van Winter vs Liz Dickson / Lisa Martin6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKristina Shelor / Sharon Walsh vs Geraldine Klauber / Eva Simmons-O'Brien6-7, 4-6
2023-07-08vs Pam BakerLost 12
W#1 DoublesFrances Sauer / Nancy van Winter vs Karie Hogan / Christine Ioannou6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKaren Robinson / Kristina Shelor vs Virginia Fung / Patricia Stavros5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBonnie Keating / Terri Mrozinski vs Liz Dickson / Marcella Miller3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Forty West 55+ 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Bonnie Keating
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Frances Sauer
published 4
3.71
Hedy Brandt
published 4
3.71
Lisa Roy
published
3.71
Robin Burton
published
3.53
Nancy van Winter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Terri Mrozinski
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Teresa Adams
published
2.90
Kristina Shelor
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Stephanie Zorn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bonnie Keating + Terri Mrozinski726052% games+3.1% vs expected
Kristina Shelor + Terri Mrozinski123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bonnie Keating
243W–234L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Frances Sauer
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Hedy Brandt
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.71
Lisa Roy
34W–13L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.71
Robin Burton
8W–11L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.71
Nancy van Winter
69W–70L career · 3 lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.53
3.5
Terri Mrozinski
366W–431L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Teresa Adams
11W–7L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.22
3
Kristina Shelor
41W–65L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
2.90
Stephanie Zorn
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.