Teams

Wheeler

2025 Neb. Adult 18&Over · 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-16vs KorteLost 14
L#1 DoublesJasmine Brown / Whitney Fritzinger vs Neli Morales / Sara Weyeneth3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesCarolyn Mcdermott vs Robin Korte6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSharon Stevens / Lyn Kummer vs Dayana Corredor / Candice Bridgford7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesDanielle Baker vs Jennifer Knorr1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSierra Futterman / Sasha Andersen vs Jennifer Strand / Michelle Diamant3-6, 6-7
2025-06-09vs HollandWon 41
W#1 DoublesDanielle Baker / Sharon Stevens vs Amy Lester / Jodi Zmiewski7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMarybeth Canning vs Caitlin Naberhaus6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSierra Futterman / Sasha Andersen vs Carmen Kelle / Danielle Parde4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesLyn Kummer vs Michelle Holland6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKari Klozenbucher / Carolyn Mcdermott vs Larisa Andreeva / Clare Morehouse6-1, 7-5
2025-06-02vs OSheaLost 23
W#1 DoublesWhitney Fritzinger / Lyn Kummer vs JENNIFER SCHWICHTENBERG / Sheila Schrader6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesDanielle Baker vs Chanda Moore4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJasmine Brown / Marybeth Canning vs TIFFANY MULLISON / Sue Olson5-7, 5-7
W#2 SinglesCarolyn Mcdermott vs Brenda Luers6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSasha Andersen / Sierra Futterman vs Leah Albers / Doris Dermann6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2025-06-01vs KorteLost 05
L#1 DoublesJasmine Brown / Whitney Fritzinger vs Kristen Cline / Robin Korte3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLauren Peterson vs Jennifer Knorr6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJill Hallgren / Carolyn Mcdermott vs Dayana Corredor / Mary Wolfe2-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 SinglesLyn Kummer vs Nancy Shank0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSasha Andersen / Sierra Futterman vs Anne Brandt / Courtney Hillebrecht3-6, 1-6
2025-05-12vs HollandWon 50
W#1 DoublesJasmine Brown / Sharon Stevens vs Jodi Zmiewski / Caitlin Naberhaus6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesCarolyn Mcdermott vs Danielle Parde6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSasha Andersen / Sierra Futterman vs Sarah Koebernick / Kayla Person6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMarybeth Canning vs Carmen Kelle7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesDanielle Baker / Lyn Kummer vs Larisa Andreeva / Erica Heninger6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2025-05-05vs OSheaWon 41
W#1 DoublesWhitney Fritzinger / Jasmine Brown vs Sheila Schrader / Sarah Albright6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLauren Peterson vs Haley Waggoner6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMarybeth Canning / Kari Klozenbucher vs JENNIFER SCHWICHTENBERG / Margaret Brockman0-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesCarolyn Mcdermott vs Leah Albers6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSasha Andersen / Sierra Futterman vs Doris Dermann / TIFFANY MULLISON3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Carolyn Mcdermott
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.92
Jasmine Brown
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.91
Jill Hallgren
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.83
Rachel Czechura
published
2.63
Lyn Kummer
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.51
Sierra Futterman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.51
Sasha Andersen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.47
Danielle Baker
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.27
Marybeth Canning
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Kari Klozenbucher
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Lauren Peterson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Sharon Stevens
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Whitney Fritzinger
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sasha Andersen + Sierra Futterman4744% games−3.1% vs expected
Whitney Fritzinger + Jasmine Brown123 matchesnot enough data
Sasha Andersen + Marybeth Canning123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Carolyn Mcdermott
10W–2L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
Jasmine Brown
14W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
Jill Hallgren
18W–21L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.91
Rachel Czechura
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Lyn Kummer
8W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
Sierra Futterman
8W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%47%53%
2.51
Sasha Andersen
6W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
2.51
2.5
Danielle Baker
5W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%59%41%
2.47
Marybeth Canning
6W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
Kari Klozenbucher
1W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Peterson
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sharon Stevens
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Whitney Fritzinger
6W–17L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.