Teams

Hardy/18/6.5/Combo/REDS

2026 LAF Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night · 6.5 Laf (18&O) Women Night

11 players · average NTRP 2.90 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 9 6:00 PM
Red Lerille's Racquet & Health Club
Sep 16 6:00 PM
vs N/A
Jenna Hardy
Sep 23 6:00 PM
The City Club at River Ranch
Sep 30 6:00 PM
Red Lerille's Racquet & Health Club
Oct 7 6:00 PM
Broussard St Julien Park
Oct 14 6:00 PM
Red Lerille's Racquet & Health Club
2026-09-02vs Dade/18/6.5/Combo/YSCLost 02
L#1 DoublesShannon Artigue / Adriana Mijares vs Mitzi Chitwood / Lindsey Chitwood4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLauren Kessler / Camille Langlinais vs Julie Hoskins / Lacey Carrigee0-6, 0-6
2026-08-26vs Fontenot/18/6.5/Combo/OCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Lognion / Cristen Chadwick vs Nichole Forstall / Katherine Riemann0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJenna Hardy / Alexis Smith vs Victoria Knott / Alida McGuire1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesShannon Artigue / Kiley Caletri vs Brandee Richardson / Michelle Mixon1-6, 1-6
2026-08-19vs Langley/18/6.5/Combo/CCRRLost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Lognion / Cristen Chadwick vs Lily Cowles / Thairy Reyes2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAdriana Mijares / Shannon Artigue vs Schantel Viator / Patti Broussard6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJenna Hardy / Courtney Svendson vs Elizabeth Langley / Judy Siefker1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 6.5 Laf (18&O) Women Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Langley/18/6.5/Combo/CCRR1030117
2LeBlanc/18/6.5/Combo/BSC1021219
3Fontenot/18/6.5/Combo/OCC1021220
4Champagne/18/6.5/Combo/Reds1021324
5Dade/18/6.5/Combo/YSC000000
6Melancon/18/6.5/Combo/BVR0112430
7Hains/18/6.5/Combo/CCRR0112430
8Breaux/18/6.5/Combo/WN/REDS0112434
9Hardy/18/6.5/Combo/REDS0103635

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.76
Shannon Artigue
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Courtney Svendson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Breanne Roesch
published 3
2.67
Adriana Mijares
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.59
Kiley Caletri
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.57
Sarah Lognion
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Lauren Kessler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.49
2.45
Cristen Chadwick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.44
Jenna Hardy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Camille Langlinais
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Lognion + Cristen Chadwick2635% games−4.9% vs expected
Kiley Caletri + Shannon Artigue314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shannon Artigue
23W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Courtney Svendson
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Breanne Roesch
4W–14L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Adriana Mijares
2W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Kiley Caletri
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.59
Sarah Lognion
3W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
2.57
Lauren Kessler
6W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
3
Anna-Corinne Daigle
1W–4L career · no lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.49
2.5
Cristen Chadwick
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%64%36%
2.45
Jenna Hardy
6W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.44
Camille Langlinais
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.