Teams

EW-YTC-Morrison

2025 Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 MEN

7 players · average NTRP 4.20 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-10-20vs VAC-AdamicskaWon 30
W#1 DoublesDon Ballew / Rob Knox vs Leonard Bauer / Matt Grant6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAl Stonas / Steve Buckingham vs Mario Caoile / Jorge Adamicska6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMark Villegas / Wally Morrison vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-10-19vs VAC-AdamicskaWon 21
W#1 DoublesDon Ballew / Mark Villegas vs Anthony Caruso / Mario Caoile6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAl Stonas / Steve Buckingham vs Leonard Bauer / Jorge Adamicska7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRobert Schefter / Rob Knox vs Matt Grant / Patrick Thomas4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-10-19vs EW-PFC-JonesLost 12
W#1 DoublesDon Ballew / Mark Villegas vs Carl Bruscoe / Craig Fager6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRob Knox / Al Stonas vs Tom Timperman / Duke Dixon6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRobert Schefter / Wally Morrison vs Jeffery Urie / David Robin1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-10-18vs EW-PFC-JonesWon 30
W#1 DoublesDon Ballew / Mark Villegas vs David Robin / Jeffery Urie6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSteve Buckingham / Al Stonas vs Kevin Jones / Tom Timperman6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRobert Schefter / Rob Knox vs Craig Fager / Curt Andersen7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Al Stonas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Don Ballew
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Robert Schefter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Wally Morrison
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.77
Mark Villegas
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Rob Knox
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Steve Buckingham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wally Morrison + Robert Schefter6357% gamesnot enough data
Wally Morrison + Mark Villegas4450% gamesnot enough data
Don Ballew + Mark Villegas5160% gamesnot enough data
Robert Schefter + Mark Villegas1443% gamesnot enough data
Rob Knox + Wally Morrison224 matchesnot enough data
Rob Knox + Don Ballew224 matchesnot enough data
Al Stonas + Steve Buckingham303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Al Stonas
10W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Don Ballew
30W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Robert Schefter
55W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
4.09
4
Wally Morrison
42W–49L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Mark Villegas
26W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Rob Knox
20W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Steve Buckingham
18W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.