Teams

EFSC - Badrak

2025 Brevard Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.90 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-08vs Desoto - SimmonsLost 01
L#2 DoublesGillian Dionne / Nuno Montenegro vs Dan Honaker / Andrea Swanson2-6, 0-6
2025-07-01vs Fee - FloresLost 01
L#2 DoublesRicardo Cortez / Angie Williams vs Nick DeFile / Amy McIntosh1-6, 4-6
2025-06-24vs Brevard/Dahl/Mixed18&Over8.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesGillian Dionne / Juan Lebron vs Bruno Pintchovski Rodrigues / Sandy Dahl1-6, 1-6
2025-06-10vs Fee - FloresLost 01
L#2 DoublesJuan Lebron / Astrid Johnson vs Jacob Kargauer / Amy McIntosh7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-03vs Brevard/Dahl/Mixed18&Over8.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJustin Hertzog / Gillian Dionne vs Shawn Coleman / Stephanie ODonnell2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-05-27vs Desoto - SimmonsLost 01
L#1 DoublesKevin Badrak / Gillian Dionne vs Jennifer Thessen / Nico San Nicolas0-6, 1-6
2025-05-20vs Fee - FloresLost 02
L#1 DoublesAstrid Johnson / Juan Lebron vs Daniel Flores / Marina Svyatnenko3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRicardo Cortez / Angie Williams vs Daniel Evans / Michelle Smith0-6, 0-6
2025-05-13vs Brevard/Dahl/Mixed18&Over8.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKevin Badrak / Astrid Johnson vs Maegan Hulscher / Elliott Hulscher6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRicardo Cortez / Angie Williams vs Naomi Coleman / Shawn Coleman5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Astrid Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.75
Kevin Badrak
published
3.75
Justin Hertzog
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Cristina Engel
published 4
3.67
Juan Lebron
published
3.65
Gillian Dionne
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.53
Ricardo Cortez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Angie Williams
published 4
3.22
James Rothe
published 3.5
Nuno Montenegro
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Astrid Johnson
94W–70L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
Kevin Badrak
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
Justin Hertzog
32W–42L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Cristina Engel
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.71
Juan Lebron
14W–19L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Gillian Dionne
95W–75L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.65
Ricardo Cortez
24W–71L career · 3 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.53
4
Angie Williams
4W–13L career · type A · no lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
3.40
3.5
James Rothe
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
Nuno Montenegro
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.