← Teams

VTC-Wilcox/Gaylor

2023 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.56 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Hong Allen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.40
Cindy Rushall
usually #3 Doubles 53%, also #1 Singles 18% · published 4
—
Denise Dawkins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Queenie Hapke
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Jenny Pizot
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Kelley Gaylor
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Annie Sumpter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.09
Lisa Provost
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Results12 ties
2023-06-24Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesDenise Dawkins / Kelley Gaylor vs Beth Rossi / Katie Jergens7-5, 6-4
2023-06-23Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesDenise Dawkins / Kelley Gaylor vs Cyndie Lempesis / Terri Ruthruff6-0, 6-3
2023-06-17Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesSusan Agee / Annie Sumpter vs Darci Keljo / Brooke Burnett6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRENEE VANDEGRIEND / Denise Dawkins vs Terri Gotcher / June Kim6-4, 6-0
2023-06-10Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesDenise Dawkins / Kelley Gaylor vs Molly Shum / Kaelin Teo6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRita Arden / Annie Sumpter vs Seungja Shin / Sharon Kim-Geib4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-06-04Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesDenise Dawkins / Suzy Rylander vs Babette Zielinski / Nancy Korenek-Leveque4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-05-07Lost 0–4
L#1 DoublesAnnie Sumpter / Sue Edmonds vs Kristie Leake / Kristin Spear6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesQueenie Hapke vs Bo Yu6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesHong Allen / Natalya Ramras vs Teresa Sullivan / Kaelin Teo6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJenny Pizot / Lisa Provost vs Molly Odonnell / Sharon Kim-Geib6-1, 6-4
2023-05-06Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesJenny Pizot / Hong Allen vs Wanda Nijholt / Kana Wakamatsu6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDenise Dawkins / Suzy Rylander vs Cathie Recker / Casey Cobb6-1, 7-5
2023-04-30Won 3–0
W#1 SinglesCindy Rushall vs Aracelia Hettle6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLori Middleton / Lisa Provost vs Robby Lafleur / Nancy Atkins0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnnie Sumpter / Suzy Rylander vs Naomi Steinberg / Cindy Speck3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2023-04-28Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesSusan Agee / Cindy Rushall vs Tina Farrelly / Carrie Putsch6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesQueenie Hapke vs Lisa Volle6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesHong Allen / Lisa Provost vs Kristen Kopack / Jennifer Simmons6-4, 6-4
2023-04-08Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesKelley Gaylor / Jacqueline Wilcox vs Cassia Carpio / Flor Harrigan6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesQueenie Hapke vs Angelina Warriner6-2, 6-4
2022-12-04Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesKelley Gaylor / Julie Gorecki vs Mary Logsdon / Stacey Burkhart6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2022-12-03Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesKelley Gaylor / Hong Allen vs Nikki Nadig / Patricia Nierenberg7-6, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Hong Allen
39W–50L career
0%58%42%
3.58
4
Cindy Rushall
100W–170L career
64%36%0%
3.40
3.5
Denise Dawkins
59W–54L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Queenie Hapke
26W–31L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Jenny Pizot
44W–56L career
4%95%0%
3.19
3.5
Kelley Gaylor
68W–64L career
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Annie Sumpter
22W–43L career
6%94%0%
3.16
3.5
Lisa Provost
37W–120L career
19%81%0%
3.09

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.