Teams

Racket Scientists

2025 Baltimore Mixed 18 & Over · Baltimore Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-22vs IoannouWon 20
W#2 DoublesRongfeng Li / Julie Edwards vs Tina Rohm / J Blue6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCalvin Braxton II / Karen Robertson vs George Roberts / Katherine Fluharty6-2, 6-3
2025-03-14vs LewisWon 10
W#1 DoublesRongfeng Li / Kristin Seidl vs Ryan Clifton / Kelly Riepe2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-03-01vs IoannouLost 02
L#1 DoublesCalvin Braxton II / Jennifer Lee vs Daniel Bryant / Eva Simmons-O'Brien6-7, 5-6
L#2 DoublesGil Myers / Kristin Seidl vs Stuart Cohen / Katherine Fluharty5-7, 5-7
2025-01-17vs LewisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKristin Seidl / Leo McCafferty vs Zaineb Makhzoumi / Ryan Clifton6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaren Robertson / Calvin Braxton II vs Alissa Wasser / Lee Wasser2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-01-12vs IoannouLost 01
L#3 DoublesTracy Flaherty / Rongfeng Li vs Stacey Hardin / George Roberts3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Baltimore Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Kate Dempsey
published
3.45
Kimberly Ford
published
3.34
3.31
Tracy Flaherty
published
3.28
Calvin Braxton II
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Rongfeng Li
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Kristin Seidl
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Gil Myers
published
Karen Robertson
published
Leo McCafferty
published
Patrick Dempsey
published
Pedro Garcia
published
Yanning Shou
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Ford + Gil Myers7168% gamesnot enough data
Pedro Garcia + Elisabeth Garcia-Wade3354% gamesnot enough data
Kate Dempsey + Patrick Dempsey3357% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kate Dempsey
29W–22L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Kimberly Ford
55W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Elisabeth Garcia-Wade
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Tracy Flaherty
12W–19L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.31
3.5
Calvin Braxton II
81W–67L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Rongfeng Li
120W–164L career · 3 lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Kristin Seidl
66W–77L career · 6 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
Gil Myers
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen Robertson
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Leo McCafferty
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patrick Dempsey
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Pedro Garcia
26W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Yanning Shou
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.