Teams

BM BLUE

2024 ITA MIXED - DEN · MIXED 8.5 - ITA

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-18vs BP NAVYLost 02
L#1 DoublesEmma Schilling / Mitchell McGregor vs Alexandra Wingert / Roman Khmelev3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCameron McGregor / Jamie Steese vs Leslie Lane / Alexandro Sandoval2-6, 2-6
2024-08-11vs MC TEALLost 01
L#2 DoublesMitchell McGregor / Jenny Kelly vs Kylie Sumpter / Cody Curtis5-7, 2-6
2024-08-04vs NJ BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesMitchell McGregor / Emma Schilling vs Yukiko Brooks / Matthew Ryan6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-07-28vs SS-LGT NAVYSplit 11
L#2 DoublesTrenton Steese / Jamie Steese vs Talia Cioth / Shawn Morgan4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSandy McGregor / Mitchell McGregor vs Julie Clapham / Michael Reisbeck2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-07-24vs NJ GREENLost 01
L#3 DoublesMitchell McGregor / Carolyn Schilling vs Brant Lahnert / Ajyra JONES1-6, 1-6
2024-07-14vs BP NAVYWon 10
W#2 DoublesTrenton Steese / Aree Bly vs Denise Belk / Chris Duncan6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 8.5 - ITA have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Susan Jeffries
published
3.80
Aree Bly
published 4
3.77
Andrew Jeffries
published 4
Trenton Steese
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Jamie Steese
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Jenny Kelly
published
3.68
Mitchell McGregor
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.65
3.62
Sandy McGregor
published 4
Emma Schilling
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mitchell McGregor + Sandy McGregor6449% games−3.5% vs expected
Susan Jeffries + Andrew Jeffries3354% gamesnot enough data
Emma Schilling + Trenton Steese033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Jeffries
11W–31L career · no lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
3.94
4
Aree Bly
14W–12L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Andrew Jeffries
4W–5L career · type M · no lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.77
4
Trenton Steese
13W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Jamie Steese
77W–100L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Jenny Kelly
37W–39L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Mitchell McGregor
63W–51L career · 8 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Carolyn Schilling
15W–33L career · type A · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.65
4
Sandy McGregor
90W–147L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.62
Emma Schilling
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.