Teams

Tranchina/70/4.0/W/LA

70 & Over Adut Multi State Invitaitonal - WOMEN · 4.0 (70&O) WOMEN

7 players · average NTRP 3.67 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-22vs LaGrossa/70/4.0/W/ARSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLynn Ogden / Mary Ruth Caldwell vs Jan Tipton / Judith Dugan0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRobin McCullough-Bade / Debbie Garner vs Tracy Nicholas / HeeYoung Fridley7-6, 6-1
2026-03-22vs McFarlain/70/4.0/W/LALost 12
W#1 DoublesDebbie Garner / Aileen Johnson vs Jeanine Bourque / Judy Placer7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRobin McCullough-Bade / Marsha Cobb vs Madeline Raymond / Cindy Robin2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLynn Ogden / Mary Ruth Caldwell vs Pat Masters / Becky McFarlain3-6, 3-6
2026-03-21vs McFarlain/70/4.0/W/LALost 03
L#1 DoublesLynn Ogden / Mary Ruth Caldwell vs Cindy Robin / Jeanine Bourque1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMarsha Cobb / Debbie Garner vs Madeline Raymond / Ruth Larimer3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRobin McCullough-Bade / Cathy Greene vs Becky McFarlain / Pat Masters2-6, 0-6
2026-03-20vs LaGrossa/70/4.0/W/ARWon 21
L#1 DoublesRobin McCullough-Bade / Cathy Greene vs Barbara Johnson / HeeYoung Fridley1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDebbie Garner / Aileen Johnson vs Susan Akins / Judith Dugan7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLynn Ogden / Mary Ruth Caldwell vs Camille LaGrossa / Sip Mouden6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 (70&O) WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Debbie Garner
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.42
Robin McCullough-Bade
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.33
Mary Ruth Caldwell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.29
Lynn Ogden
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.28
Aileen Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Marsha Cobb
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Cathy Greene
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynn Ogden + Mary Ruth Caldwell134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Debbie Garner
13W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.72
Robin McCullough-Bade
3W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
73%27%<1%
3.42
Mary Ruth Caldwell
14W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
91%9%<1%
3.33
Lynn Ogden
6W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
95%5%<1%
3.29
3.5
Aileen Johnson
22W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.28
Marsha Cobb
5W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
3.23
3.5
Cathy Greene
1W–6L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
2.89

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.