Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Chytraus/Weeks

2024 Winter League-Saturday · 2.5W Saturday

11 players · average NTRP 2.67 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesMaddy Garrett / Cicily Beckstead vs Lori Prince Hagood / Melina Ward0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKimberly Chytraus / Sandy Weeks vs LINDSAY MORGAN / Emelia Schinke6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMeera Patel / Ann Monroy vs Jean Whitlock / Susan Heap4-6, 5-3, 0-1
2024-03-23vs Sports Mall-Team FunLost 12
L#1 DoublesCicily Beckstead / Sandy Weeks vs Olivia Moreton / Annie Mortensen2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAnn Monroy / Laurie Gustafson vs Heidi Firth / Hailey Jensen6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKimberly Chytraus / Heather Wissler vs Audrey Beattie / Lindsay Roth2-6, 0-6
2024-03-16vs Wasatch Hills-En FuegoLost 03
L#1 DoublesCicily Beckstead / Sandy Weeks vs Raquel Huamani / Krisann Humphreys4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnn Monroy / E Edith Johnson vs Remi Turley / Teresa Hatter3-6, 4-5
L#3 DoublesLaurie Gustafson / Meera Patel vs Lynn Hepperly / Joy Miya4-6, 2-1, 1-0
2024-03-09vs Salt Lake Tennis-Williams/KilleenLost 02
L#1 DoublesMaddy Garrett / E Edith Johnson vs Kelly Singer / Diana Vogel3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Alpizar / Heather Wissler vs Sheila Killeen / Candace Haroldsen1-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesAnn Monroy / Maddy Garrett vs Aihan Ni / Lori Prince Hagood0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesE Edith Johnson / Amy Looney vs Jean Whitlock / LINDSAY MORGAN1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStephanie Alpizar / Kimberly Chytraus vs Susan Heap / Sabrina Vienneau6-4, 4-2
2024-02-10vs Sports Mall-Team FunLost 03
L#1 DoublesMaddy Garrett / Stephanie Alpizar vs Olivia Moreton / Melanie Olsen2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKimberly Chytraus / Cicily Beckstead vs Annie Mortensen / Meghan Boyd0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesE Edith Johnson / Meera Patel vs Madison Milligan / Lindsay Roth1-6, 0-6
2024-02-03vs Wasatch Hills-En FuegoLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnn Monroy / Maddy Garrett vs Trena Anderson / Krisann Humphreys6-7, 3-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKimberly Chytraus / Stephanie Alpizar vs Lynn Hepperly / Raquel Huamani1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLaurie Gustafson / Cicily Beckstead vs Shelly Kaihatu / Tejaswini Vaidya1-6, 1-6
2024-01-27vs Salt Lake Tennis-Williams/KilleenLost 03
L#1 DoublesSandy Weeks / Cicily Beckstead vs Diana Vogel / Kelly Singer1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHeather Wissler / Amy Looney vs Candace Haroldsen / Sheila Killeen1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesStephanie Alpizar / Kimberly Chytraus vs Jenna Pike / Lynn Fuller5-7, 5-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.33 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.68
Sandy Weeks
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.65
Ann Monroy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.42
Cicily Beckstead
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
Amy Looney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.13
Kimberly Chytraus
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.07
Heather Wissler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.01
Laurie Gustafson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
E Edith Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Maddy Garrett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Meera Patel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Stephanie Alpizar
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Chytraus + Sandy Weeks7748% games+11.4% vs expected
Kimberly Chytraus + Heather Wissler2932% games−9.8% vs expected
Sandy Weeks + Cicily Beckstead1438% games−10.6% vs expected
Kimberly Chytraus + Stephanie Alpizar134 matchesnot enough data
Heather Wissler + Stephanie Alpizar123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Sandy Weeks
67W–61L career · 8 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Ann Monroy
40W–27L career · 10 lines in 2024
15%85%1%
2.65
2.5
Cicily Beckstead
37W–60L career · 6 lines in 2024
0%71%29%
2.42
2.5
Amy Looney
3W–26L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Kimberly Chytraus
26W–56L career · 6 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.13
2.5
Heather Wissler
17W–33L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Laurie Gustafson
10W–22L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.01
E Edith Johnson
1W–5L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Maddy Garrett
5W–21L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Meera Patel
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stephanie Alpizar
5W–9L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.