Teams

BASALT BLACK

2022 CTA TWILIGHT - ASPEN · MOUNTAINS

7 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-10-03vs GSCC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesSUSAN CHRISTMAN / Renee Fleisher vs Ashley Eberly / Kelly Zevin4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSuzanne Wheeler-Del Piccolo vs Lisa Palmer7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2022-09-26vs GSCC REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Wheeler-Del Piccolo / Renee Fleisher vs Kristin Davis / Margo Stapleton4-6, 4-6
2022-09-19vs GSCC REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesDena Albright / Suzanne Wheeler-Del Piccolo vs Kelly Zevin / Lisa Palmer1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesWendy Hayden vs Kristin Davis6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSUSAN CHRISTMAN / Renee Fleisher vs Margo Stapleton / Julie Hartman7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2022-09-12vs GSCC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Wheeler-Del Piccolo / Wendy Hayden vs Kelly Zevin / Lisa Palmer6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesSUSAN CHRISTMAN vs Ashley Eberly6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDena Albright / Renee Fleisher vs Margo Stapleton / Julie Hartman4-6, 1-6
2022-08-29vs GSCC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesWendy Hayden / SUSAN CHRISTMAN vs Julie Hartman / Kristin Davis6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesSuzanne Wheeler-Del Piccolo vs Kelly Zevin5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDena Albright / Renee Fleisher vs Margo Stapleton / Ashley Eberly6-4, 7-6
2022-08-22vs GSCC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Wheeler-Del Piccolo / Renee Fleisher vs Ashley Eberly / Lisa Palmer3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesDena Albright vs Kristin Davis3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MOUNTAINS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Shelley Lundh
published 4
2.63
Richlyn Pavcek
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.11
Dena Albright
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Renee Fleisher
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
SUSAN CHRISTMAN
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Suzanne Wheeler-Del Piccolo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Wendy Hayden
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Hayden + Richlyn Pavcek2350% gamesnot enough data
Renee Fleisher + Suzanne Wheeler-Del Piccolo033 matchesnot enough data
Dena Albright + Suzanne Wheeler-Del Piccolo213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Shelley Lundh
75W–121L career · no lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.56
Richlyn Pavcek
47W–60L career · 4 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
2.63
2.5
Dena Albright
15W–31L career · 4 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Renee Fleisher
2W–14L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
SUSAN CHRISTMAN
3W–2L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Suzanne Wheeler-Del Piccolo
12W–28L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Wendy Hayden
15W–22L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.