Teams

10 Burkwood Lee

2025 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekday 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-23vs 14 WW Combs-PokrywkaLost 01
L#1 DoublesLynne Moore / Melissa Allen vs Meghan Dexter / Colleen Quinn6-7, 2-2
2025-07-18vs 16 Twin Hickory YuLost 01
L#1 DoublesMelissa Allen / Diana Gary vs Michelle Yu / Kristy Babcock3-6, 5-7
2025-07-11vs 8 MTC HilbertLost 01
L#1 DoublesEllen Bedichek / Melissa Allen vs Jennifer Shaffer / Amanda Mayhew2-6, 6-7
2025-06-20vs 2 ACAC Baby Got Backhand - JonesWon 10
W#1 DoublesEllen Bedichek / Melissa Allen vs Tracey Watson / Kimberly Williams4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekday 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Melissa Allen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Kimberley Dages
published
3.30
Karen Albon
published
3.30
Beth Krider
published 3.5
3.28
Tara Sobel
published
3.28
Yen Huynh
published
3.17
Ellen Bedichek
published
3.10
Lynne Moore
published
3.07
Sandy Cook
published
3.02
Donna Mourtzakis
published
3.01
Diana Gary
published 3.5
3.00
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Mourtzakis + Ellen Bedichek6752% games+4.2% vs expected
Diana Gary + Lynne Moore123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Melissa Allen
115W–116L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Kimberley Dages
14W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Karen Albon
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Beth Krider
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
Tara Sobel
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Yen Huynh
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Ellen Bedichek
10W–17L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Lynne Moore
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Sandy Cook
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
Donna Mourtzakis
14W–15L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.02
3.5
Diana Gary
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
Teresa Landes-Shuler
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.