Teams

SALESIAN HS 18AM3.5A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
L#1 DoublesJason Ehrlich / Bill Anderson vs Ty Karaba / Er Liu4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAaron Starfire vs Do Kim2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNicholas Paige / Jerome Parmer vs Matthew Rubin / Kenny Hua4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesDoug van Slyke vs Henry Kayser2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesTom Betts / William McCormack vs James Hodson / Bill Manley3-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Inderjit Dhillon
published
3.31
Aaron Ilan
published 3.5
3.29
Tom Betts
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Dennis Totah
published 3.5
3.25
Aaron Starfire
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Joel Warford
published
3.22
David Dunetz
published 3.5
3.11
Doug van Slyke
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.10
Nicholas Paige
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Kyle Jones
published
2.99
Greg Kalustian
published
2.93
William McCormack
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Dominic Aiello
published
Jason Ehrlich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jerome Parmer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
MacE Thompson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aaron Ilan + Inderjit Dhillon314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Inderjit Dhillon
13W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Aaron Ilan
13W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Tom Betts
13W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Dennis Totah
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Aaron Starfire
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Joel Warford
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.22
3.5
David Dunetz
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Doug van Slyke
8W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Nicholas Paige
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Kyle Jones
9W–19L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
Greg Kalustian
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.99
William McCormack
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
70%30%<1%
2.93
Dominic Aiello
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jason Ehrlich
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jerome Parmer
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
MacE Thompson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.