Teams

Elings-Tennis is Life

Adult 18 & Over - SB Spring · SB - Men - 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.88 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-10vs COAC-LIONSWon 10
W#1 DoublesMatthew Morphy / Daniel Thompson vs Melvin DeSilva / Chris Agh6-3, 6-3
2022-06-19vs COAC-Average JoesWon 10
W#1 DoublesDaniel Thompson / Matthew Morphy vs Barrett O'Gorman / Jon Fernandez7-6, 6-3
2022-06-11vs Central Coast-TS Hot ShotsLost 01
L#2 DoublesDaniel Thompson / Dylan Minor vs Thomas Gonzales / Thomas Reynolds3-6, 6-7
2022-06-05vs SBTC-Late BloomersLost 01
L#2 DoublesSalvatore Dellabarca / Daniel Thompson vs Matthew Arnold / Zohair Hussain4-6, 3-6
2022-05-22vs COAC-LIONSWon 10
W#1 DoublesDaniel Thompson / Dylan Minor vs Ryne Walz / Ronald Guadagno0-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-05-15vs COAC-Average JoesWon 10
W#1 DoublesDaniel Thompson / Matthew Morphy vs Richard Berton / Barrett O'Gorman4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-05-01Won 10
W#1 DoublesChris Posch / Daniel Thompson vs Matthew Arnold / Jeffrey Wong7-6, 6-4
2022-04-24vs Central Coast-TS Hot ShotsWon 10
W#1 DoublesMatthew Morphy / Daniel Thompson vs Sergio Orozco / Jonathan Decker6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SB - Men - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Chris Posch
published 4
Dylan Minor
published 4
3.68
Ryan Chambers
published
3.67
Daniel Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.65
LUKE NORONHA
published
3.63
Matthew Morphy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Sergey Slyutov
published
3.45
Brian Swanson
published 3.5
3.35
Michael Mantai
published
Jon Green
published
Rick Flores
published
Scott Jordan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Thompson + Matthew Morphy11060% games+7.3% vs expected
LUKE NORONHA + Brian Swanson2740% games+4.6% vs expected
Dylan Minor + Matthew Morphy1435% gamesnot enough data
Dylan Minor + Chris Posch224 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Morphy + Chris Posch134 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Thompson + Dylan Minor303 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Thompson + Chris Posch213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chris Posch
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Dylan Minor
19W–19L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ryan Chambers
19W–11L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Daniel Thompson
80W–50L career · 8 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
LUKE NORONHA
3W–21L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
Matthew Morphy
85W–41L career · 4 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.63
Sergey Slyutov
13W–30L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.62
3.5
Brian Swanson
12W–33L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
3.45
Michael Mantai
36W–30L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
Jon Green
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rick Flores
11W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Scott Jordan
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.