← Teams

PT&E/SJRC-Diaz De Leon/Gay

2024 Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

6 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Ralf Bednarz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
—
Arturo Barroso
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
—
Gabriel Barroso Mendoza
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.75
Jason Job
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
—
Nicole Floyd
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.66
Miguel Diaz de Leon
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Results8 ties
2024-03-10Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesNicole Floyd / Ralf Bednarz vs Trish Peters / Jon Peters6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMichelle Gay / Arturo Barroso vs Tomoko Langworthy / Ben Yamaguchi6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMiriam Latzer / Gabriel Barroso Mendoza vs Barbara Pasmore / Jack Crossen6-1, 6-4
2024-03-09Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesMichelle Gay / Gabriel Barroso Mendoza vs Jennifer Trank / Stephen Drew6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAngela Diaz de Leon / Miguel Diaz de Leon vs Ivy Lane / Patrick Priest6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMiriam Latzer / Jason Job vs Lisa Mayer / Shahin Ansari6-2, 6-2
2024-03-03Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesAngela Diaz de Leon / Arturo Barroso vs Joel Naumoff / Jennifer Stevenson6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMiriam Latzer / Miguel Diaz de Leon vs Jeffrey Bayless / Jennifer Bayless6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMichelle Gay / Gabriel Barroso Mendoza vs Fenn Bourland / Sarah Fredericks6-3, 6-4
2024-02-17Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesMichelle Gay / Arturo Barroso vs Tara Morissette / Scott Dickinson6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAngela Diaz de Leon / Miguel Diaz de Leon vs Dayna Jahnke-Corwin / Larry Corwin7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMiriam Latzer / Jason Job vs Pamela Grant / Steven Grant6-2, 6-3
2024-02-16Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesAngela Diaz de Leon / Miguel Diaz de Leon vs Robert Glenn / Chelsea McGraw6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMichelle Gay / Gabriel Barroso Mendoza vs Ryan Owens / Sharon Wise6-2, 6-0
2024-02-11Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesMichelle Gay / Arturo Barroso vs Craig Tompkins / Jing Bennett6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMiguel Diaz de Leon / Miriam Latzer vs Kristi Tompkins / Feng-Yu Liu6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAngela Diaz de Leon / Gabriel Barroso Mendoza vs Keibun Hayashi / Leanne Kong6-0, 6-3
2024-01-26Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesNicole Floyd / Ralf Bednarz vs Amy Carolan / Tim Janes3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAngela Diaz de Leon / Arturo Barroso vs Rose Lee / Richard Nobleman6-7, 4-2
2024-01-07Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesNicole Floyd / Ralf Bednarz vs Katie Jurgenson / Ryan Linnman7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAngela Diaz de Leon / Jason Job vs Madeleine Bourland / Eric Sowle6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMichelle Gay / Gabriel Barroso Mendoza vs Jennifer Stevenson / Kip Stevenson6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Ralf Bednarz
69W–43L career
0%68%32%
3.05
3
Arturo Barroso
17W–37L career
not enough data
—
3
Gabriel Barroso Mendoza
7W–36L career
not enough data
—
3
Jason Job
0W–10L career · type M
3%95%1%
2.75
3
Nicole Floyd
35W–56L career
not enough data
—
3
Miguel Diaz de Leon
8W–28L career · type S
10%90%0%
2.66

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.