Teams

AG RED

2026 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - MOUNTAINS · WOMEN 3.0 - DAYTIME DOUBLES - MOUNTAINS

11 players · average NTRP 2.90 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-24vs BASALT BLACKWon 21
L#1 DoublesGay Wisch / Susan Ilitch vs Shauna de Moraes / Carolyn Strautman6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBarbara Sport / Pamela Niro vs Kate McRaith / Amy Daniel6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLinda Huntsman / Nicole McDermott vs Richlyn Pavcek / Stephanie Hayes2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-07-17vs BASALT BLACKWon 21
L#1 DoublesSusan Ilitch / Nicole McDermott vs Shauna de Moraes / Lauren Raymond3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMary Jo Murphy / Pamela Niro vs Richlyn Pavcek / Stephanie Hayes6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesGay Wisch / Carolyn Hayes vs Nancy Garrigus / Lynsey Pulliam2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-07-10vs BASALT BLACKWon 21
L#1 DoublesGay Wisch / Nicole McDermott vs Carolyn Strautman / Shauna de Moraes2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPamela Niro / Linda Huntsman vs Lynsey Pulliam / Kate McRaith6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCarolyn Hayes / Julie Glen vs Nancy Garrigus / Amy Daniel6-2, 7-5
2026-06-26vs BASALT BLACKLost 02
L#1 DoublesPamela Niro / Linda Huntsman vs Carolyn Strautman / Shauna de Moraes4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesGay Wisch / Julie Glen vs Stephanie Hayes / Amy Daniel2-6, 2-6
2026-06-19vs BASALT BLACKSplit 11
W#1 DoublesGay Wisch / Susan Ilitch vs Shauna de Moraes / Kate McRaith6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBarbara Sport / Carolyn Hayes vs Richlyn Pavcek / Lauren Raymond1-6, 6-7
2026-06-12vs BASALT BLACKWon 21
W#1 DoublesGay Wisch / Julie Glen vs Richlyn Pavcek / Stephanie Hayes7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMary Jo Murphy / Susan Ilitch vs Lynsey Pulliam / Lauren Raymond6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesClaire Green / Arlene Goetz vs Jackie Kaplan / Jodi Jacobson3-6, 1-6
2026-06-05vs BASALT BLACKLost 12
L#1 DoublesArlene Goetz / Nicole McDermott vs Carolyn Strautman / Shauna de Moraes1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesGay Wisch / Susan Ilitch vs Jackie Kaplan / Amy Daniel5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMary Jo Murphy / Julie Glen vs Richlyn Pavcek / Kate McRaith7-6, 6-3
2026-05-29vs BASALT BLACKLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Ilitch / Julie Glen vs Carolyn Strautman / Shauna de Moraes4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNicole McDermott / Pamela Niro vs Kate McRaith / Amy Daniel2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesArlene Goetz / Linda Huntsman vs Jackie Kaplan / Jodi Jacobson4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · WOMEN 3.0 - DAYTIME DOUBLES - MOUNTAINS
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1AG RED44101432250

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Mary Jo Murphy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.82
Linda Huntsman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.81
Julie Glen
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.79
Arlene Goetz
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Claire Green
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Gay Wisch
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.71
Susan Ilitch
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.65
Carolyn Hayes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.62
Nicole McDermott
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.60
Pamela Niro
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.26
Barbara Sport
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Arlene Goetz + Mary Jo Murphy3352% games+6.2% vs expected
Carolyn Hayes + Gay Wisch5358% games+4.5% vs expected
Linda Huntsman + Gay Wisch2446% games+1.4% vs expected
Claire Green + Barbara Sport1536% games−5.0% vs expected
Arlene Goetz + Pamela Niro1446% games−5.7% vs expected
Barbara Sport + Gay Wisch1432% games−14.4% vs expected
Claire Green + Linda Huntsman5255% gamesnot enough data
Claire Green + Gay Wisch1635% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Jo Murphy
21W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.89
Linda Huntsman
18W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
2.82
Julie Glen
16W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Arlene Goetz
12W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Claire Green
15W–28L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Gay Wisch
23W–40L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
Susan Ilitch
3W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.71
3
Carolyn Hayes
10W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
2.65
Nicole McDermott
2W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.62
Pamela Niro
24W–39L career · 5 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
2.5
Barbara Sport
6W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.26

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.