Teams

MAD:4.0 Mad Men 40&:Sobolewski

2021 ECT Adult 40 & Over Men · 4.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-06-13vs GF:United Drives 4.0:White/KnightLost 02
L#1 DoublesPaul Sobolewski / John M Dusza vs Michael Knight / Corey Deixler1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesVivek Parwani vs John Cianciolo3-6, 6-2
2021-05-23vs LS:KirwanLost 02
L#1 DoublesPaul Malafronte / John M Dusza vs Aaron Casey / Andy Strickler4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesThomas Bouchard / Andrew Montgomery vs Joe Binks / Dennis Aspesi3-6, 2-6
2021-05-08vs GF:United Drives 4.0:White/KnightLost 02
L#1 DoublesPaul Sobolewski / Gary Scharf vs Matthew Fraenza / Craig Gambardella2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAndrew Montgomery / Simon Chalfoun vs Mark Raisbeck / Charles Dear1-6, 1-6
2021-04-18vs LS:KirwanLost 02
L#1 DoublesPaul Malafronte / Thomas Bouchard vs Dennis Aspesi / Matthew Goldreich0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPaul Sobolewski / Joseph Goclowski vs Agnish Mukhopadhyay / Jonathan Dahl3-6, 3-6
2021-04-11vs GF:United Drives 4.0:White/KnightWon 21
L#1 DoublesRichard Wies / John M Dusza vs Matthew Fraenza / Philip Dinauer2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesVivek Parwani vs Corey Deixler6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesGary Scharf / Paul Sobolewski vs Paul White / John Cianciolo6-3, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LS:Kirwan03102456
2GF:United Drives 4.0:White/Knight049716128
3MAD:4.0 Mad Men 40&:Sobolewski0551533216

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
John M Dusza
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Andrew Montgomery
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Marc Nadeau
published
Patrick Fitzgibbons
published
Paul Malafronte
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Paul Sobolewski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Vivek Parwani
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Malafronte + Paul Sobolewski7652% games+7.4% vs expected
John M Dusza + Paul Sobolewski123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John M Dusza
27W–31L career · 3 lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.64
Andrew Montgomery
0W–10L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Marc Nadeau
0W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Patrick Fitzgibbons
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Paul Malafronte
60W–54L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Paul Sobolewski
15W–30L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Vivek Parwani
14W–10L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.