Teams

PROCTER55

2022 Cap Mixed 55 & over · 8.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 4.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-03vs SRABBYLost 02
L#1 DoublesSusan Doninger Greer / Thomas Stieber vs Jean Haas / John VanDeWater5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRebecca Procter / Alan Crews vs Tiffany Harris / Raul Suarez3-6, 5-7
2022-07-27vs JSageLost 01
L#3 DoublesThomas Stieber / Susan Doninger Greer vs Annette Page / Rhett Hartley6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-07-20vs BFRANCISLost 12
L#1 DoublesJeanne Bauer / Robert Jackson vs Rob Butler / Joanne Butler6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichael Hamlett / Catherine Brawner vs Keven Griffith / Cynthia Smith6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAlan Crews / Rebecca Procter vs Bill Francis / Isabelle Homes Gesher4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-07-07vs LBroadwayWon 20
W#1 DoublesCatherine Brawner / Alan Crews vs Marcia Fort / Anthony Williams6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRebecca Procter / Michael Marchi vs Ann Whitaker / Joel Broadway7-5, 6-3
2022-06-29vs SRABBYWon 10
W#3 DoublesRebecca Procter / Michael Marchi vs Andrea Pfeiffer / Ken Glanville6-4, 6-0
2022-06-22vs JSageSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichael Hamlett / Catherine Brawner vs Gregory Gulden / Shelly Schiff6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRobert Jackson / Jeanne Bauer vs John van Campen / Juli Korsnack3-6, 3-6
2022-06-15Won 20
W#1 DoublesMichael Hamlett / Catherine Brawner vs Scott Mason / Elizabeth Hensley6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesThomas Stieber / Rebecca Procter vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-01vs LBroadwayLost 01
L#3 DoublesMichael Marchi / Rebecca Procter vs Mary Hoag / Jeffrey Monaghen7-6, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Jeanne Bauer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.78
Michael Hamlett
published
3.75
Michael Marchi
published
3.72
Thomas Stieber
published
3.72
Alan Crews
published 4
3.64
Jean Harrold
published
3.60
Catherine Brawner
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.48
Rebecca Procter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.38
Susan Doninger Greer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jeanne Bauer
111W–108L career · 2 lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
4.04
Michael Hamlett
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.78
Michael Marchi
15W–4L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Thomas Stieber
14W–9L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Alan Crews
18W–14L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
Jean Harrold
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Catherine Brawner
112W–94L career · 4 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Rebecca Procter
185W–147L career · 6 lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
3.48
4
Susan Doninger Greer
97W–125L career · 2 lines in 2022
83%17%<1%
3.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.