Teams

Ri.McClenny40M

2024 Capital Mixed 40 & Over · 4.5

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-07-25vs Ja.Campbell40MWon 10
W#1 DoublesRichard McClenny / Betsy Shoffner vs Gary Caiola / Sheila Riley7-5, 6-3
2024-07-24vs Li.Ihly40MWon 10
W#3 DoublesRichard McClenny / Betsy Shoffner vs William Caldwell / Elizabeth Speicher3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-07-20vs Er.Rankin40MWon 10
W#3 DoublesRichard McClenny / Betsy Shoffner vs Matthew Presser / Paula Fernandez-Pita7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2024-07-20vs Ja.Campbell40MWon 10
W#1 DoublesRichard McClenny / Lindsey Moore vs David Peters / Sandra Rhoades6-4, 6-3
2024-05-23vs He.Remley40MLost 01
L#3 DoublesRichard McClenny / Brandy Kmiec vs Casey Black / Karen Griffin7-6, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.21 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Betsy Shoffner
published 4.5
4.35
Emily Tinervin
published 4.5
4.34
Brandy Kmiec
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.25
Richard McClenny
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.25
Tim Rufiange
published
4.24
Shelly Kirkpatrick
published 4.5
4.21
Patrick Shields
published
4.11
Leigh Mullins
published
4.11
Shaun Ward
published
3.81
William Jones
published
Jason Abhau
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Betsy Shoffner + Richard McClenny8072% gamesnot enough data
Brandy Kmiec + Richard McClenny224 matchesnot enough data
Richard McClenny + Shelly Kirkpatrick404 matchesnot enough data
Emily Tinervin + Richard McClenny303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Betsy Shoffner
98W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
4.40
4.5
Emily Tinervin
176W–72L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
4.35
4.5
Brandy Kmiec
107W–55L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%88%11%
4.34
4.5
Richard McClenny
432W–130L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
4.25
Tim Rufiange
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Shelly Kirkpatrick
91W–36L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
4.24
Patrick Shields
43W–14L career · no lines in 2024
5%93%1%
4.21
Leigh Mullins
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
4.11
Shaun Ward
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
4.11
William Jones
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
93%7%<1%
3.81
Jason Abhau
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.