Teams

Plantation Cohn

2024 Sarasota Adult 40 & Over Winter Weekend · 4.0 W Saturday

17 players · average NTRP 4.05 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-03-23vs River Strand BeeneLost 02
L#1 DoublesAudrey Cohn / Christine Santucci vs Nancy Finman / Kim Reiser1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTheresa Watson / Valerie Lansdale vs Bernadette King / Judi Wilson5-7, 3-6
2024-03-09vs Laurel Oak CrosbySplit 11
W#1 DoublesAudrey Cohn / Christine Santucci vs Sandra Poston / Teri Sayre6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesClaudia Schmidt vs Jennifer Stroble2-6, 3-6
2024-03-02vs Payne Park SmithLost 12
L#1 DoublesClaudia Schmidt / Ellen Lori Smith MD vs Jet Sagalow / Annthonia Prossi6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAudrey Cohn vs Cristina Tomadin4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMarjorie Petruccelli / Maureen Rasp-Glose vs Nikki Gifford / Fabiola Beckmann6-3, 6-0
2024-02-24vs Payne Park Wilson-SnyderLost 12
L#1 DoublesDiane Crews / Valerie Lansdale vs Robyn Rhodes / Judith Lubbers1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAna Areosa vs Maria Dull6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLynn Deuitch / Maureen Rasp-Glose vs Cindy Wilson-Snyder / Mari-Ann Kucharek6-4, 6-0
2024-02-17vs LWR NicholsonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJanet Kramer / Valerie Lansdale vs Karen Collins / Victoria Reid6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAudrey Cohn / Cynthia Horton vs Sandy Severs / Lauren Larkin3-6, 1-6
2024-02-10vs Laurel Oak CrosbyLost 01
L#2 DoublesAudrey Cohn / Lesli Andrews vs Sandra Poston / Carrie Walsh4-6, 3-6
2024-02-03vs River Strand BeeneWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarjorie Petruccelli / Diane Crews vs Nancy Finman / Kara Beene6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesClaudia Schmidt vs Susanne Booth6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLynn Deuitch / Ana Areosa vs Bernadette King / Judi Wilson6-4, 6-2
2024-01-27vs Payne Park SmithSplit 11
W#1 SinglesClaudia Schmidt vs Tambra Ford6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDiane Crews / Valerie Lansdale vs Roberta Smith / Ann Lammers6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2024-01-25vs Payne Park Wilson-SnyderSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAudrey Cohn / Maria Riccio vs Tanya Kelly / Lisa Klemeyer2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesClaudia Schmidt vs Celia Pena6-1, 6-4
2024-01-14vs LWR NicholsonLost 02
L#2 DoublesAudrey Cohn / Ellen Lori Smith MD vs Sheila Perry / Sandra Barkey4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJanet Kramer / Maureen Rasp-Glose vs Nia Esposito / Diana Stadelnikas2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Diane DeGurian
published 4.5
4.10
Marjorie Petruccelli
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.89
Ana Areosa
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.81
Lynn Deuitch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.80
3.79
Diane Crews
published 4
3.72
Claudia Schmidt
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.69
Audrey Cohn
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.62
Cynthia Horton
published 4
3.55
Theresa Watson
published
3.53
Valerie Lansdale
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.47
Lesli Andrews
published
3.27
Christine Santucci
published 3.5
Ellen Lori Smith MD
published
Janet Kramer
published
Maria Riccio
published
Maureen Rasp-Glose
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marjorie Petruccelli + Diane DeGurian5455% games+6.1% vs expected
Ana Areosa + Lynn Deuitch8751% games+0.3% vs expected
Ana Areosa + Marjorie Petruccelli8555% games−2.1% vs expected
Maureen Rasp-Glose + Lynn Deuitch4352% gamesnot enough data
Maureen Rasp-Glose + Audrey Cohn1534% gamesnot enough data
Ana Areosa + Janet Kramer314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Diane DeGurian
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
4.29
4.5
Marjorie Petruccelli
85W–64L career · 5 lines in 2024
24%75%<1%
4.10
4
Ana Areosa
139W–118L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Lynn Deuitch
137W–135L career · 8 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Anne Vaillancourt
102W–87L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Diane Crews
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Claudia Schmidt
34W–25L career · 5 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Audrey Cohn
146W–120L career · 7 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Cynthia Horton
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.62
Theresa Watson
4W–14L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.55
4
Valerie Lansdale
46W–49L career · 4 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.53
Lesli Andrews
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Christine Santucci
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Ellen Lori Smith MD
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Janet Kramer
20W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Maria Riccio
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Maureen Rasp-Glose
41W–52L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.