Teams

Q FV:Wild Cards:Fishman/Aronson

2022 NCT Adult 18 & Over Women Summer · 4.0 Women

20 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-18vs BSF:Kick Aces:Murnane/MuttarelliWon 31
W#1 DoublesEsther Aronson / Jennifer Mazzocca vs Nanci Bernstein / Sarah Mutarelli6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAanya Mehta vs Dana Battiston6-1, 7-6
L#2 SinglesSuzanne Quaintance vs Marian Hanson4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJodi Levine / Mary Kate Higham vs Debbie White / Heather Goetz6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesNidale Chaho / Jill Fisher vs Lauren Riether-Mills / Lisa Mazzucco1-4
L#1 SinglesAanya Mehta vs Opal Bravo6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRebecca Fishman / Liz Stockwell vs Jaybel Yazon / Jia Yazon5-7
W#2 SinglesEsther Aronson vs Christine Abreu6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJodi Levine / Teresa Perrucci vs Karen Burgess / Vali Schoenfeld6-4, 7-5
W#1 DoublesJill Fisher / Jean Robbins vs Jennifer King / Sheri Eklund2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDebra Raviv vs Sarah Stapleton6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCheryl Glasgow / Teresa Perrucci vs Amy Branch / Tamara Hochman6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMary Kate Higham vs Stacy Millman6-0, 7-6
L#3 DoublesKathi Hefler / Deborah Sullivan vs Laura Giannone / Monica Melchionni-Curtis4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-06-21vs BSF:Kick Aces:Murnane/MuttarelliWon 40
W#1 DoublesJill Fisher / Nidale Chaho vs Suzanne Neville / Jennifer Murnane6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMary Kate Higham vs Dana Battiston2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesUma Mehta / Teresa Perrucci vs Patia Haverty / Debbie White6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKathi Hefler / Suzanne Petersen vs Sarah Mutarelli / Dawn O'Shaughnessy7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2022-06-16vs Q FV:Summer Fearhands:Goodwin/KingLost 23
L#1 DoublesLiz Stockwell / Carolyn McGarr-Lee vs Cari Anne Goodwin / Valerie Sorensen4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesUma Mehta vs Katharine Miller6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRebecca Fishman / Esther Aronson vs Jennifer King / Sheri Eklund7-6, 0-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSuzanne Quaintance vs Sarah Stapleton3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCheryl Glasgow / Jill Fisher vs Dana McCormick / Monica Melchionni-Curtis6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2022-06-08vs GTC:Causing a Racquet:Eller/SiracusaSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSusan Healey / Jennifer Mazzocca vs Lauren Riether-Mills / Jaybel Yazon0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesDebra Raviv vs Jade Schoenfeld7-6, 2-0
W#2 DoublesEsther Aronson / Liz Stockwell vs Karen Eller / Corinne Ross6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKathi Hefler / Deborah Sullivan vs Opal Bravo / Denise Slaughter2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GTC:Causing a Racquet:Eller/Siracusa06201026214
2Q FV:Wild Cards:Fishman/Aronson06181229238
3Q FV:Summer Fearhands:Goodwin/King06171332271
4BSF:Kick Aces:Murnane/Muttarelli0632755331
5NTC:O.G. Double Shots:Siebert/Page08271333302
6BSF:Set2win:Bratz/Song08221839325
7EBTC:Summer Setz:Jones/Ferris08211942345
8Q EHTC:The Powershots:Blair/Marrion08202045349
9SIMS:Sweet Shots:Chapel/Kaplan0893166444

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Debra Raviv
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.75
Nidale Chaho
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Esther Aronson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Jennifer Mazzocca
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Susan Healey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Jill Fisher
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.62
Carolyn McGarr-Lee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Mary Kate Higham
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
3.57
Rebecca Fishman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Cheryl Glasgow
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.50
Aanya Mehta
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.48
Deborah Sullivan
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.46
Suzanne Quaintance
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Jean Robbins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jodi Levine
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kathi Hefler
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Liz Stockwell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Suzanne Petersen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Teresa Perrucci
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Uma Mehta
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Liz Stockwell + Esther Aronson4162% games+11.6% vs expected
Jennifer Mazzocca + Esther Aronson6656% games+8.6% vs expected
Liz Stockwell + Rebecca Fishman4257% games+6.8% vs expected
Nidale Chaho + Mary Kate Higham3256% games+4.9% vs expected
Debra Raviv + Rebecca Fishman3551% games+4.0% vs expected
Jean Robbins + Carolyn McGarr-Lee19956% games+3.4% vs expected
Nidale Chaho + Jennifer Mazzocca5750% games+0.9% vs expected
Nidale Chaho + Jill Fisher8852% games−0.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Debra Raviv
79W–59L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.94
Nidale Chaho
42W–57L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Esther Aronson
161W–142L career · 4 lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.65
Jennifer Mazzocca
83W–110L career · 2 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
Susan Healey
37W–47L career · 1 line in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
Jill Fisher
45W–31L career · 4 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Carolyn McGarr-Lee
113W–69L career · 1 line in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
Mary Kate Higham
36W–30L career · 7 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.61
Rebecca Fishman
86W–144L career · 2 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.57
4
Cheryl Glasgow
93W–96L career · 2 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.56
4
Aanya Mehta
15W–15L career · 2 lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.50
4
Deborah Sullivan
175W–129L career · 7 lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
3.48
Suzanne Quaintance
63W–59L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.46
Jean Robbins
57W–47L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Jodi Levine
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathi Hefler
75W–82L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
Liz Stockwell
116W–93L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Suzanne Petersen
21W–12L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Teresa Perrucci
44W–58L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Uma Mehta
24W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.