Teams

CUBBERLEY 18AM4.0A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 4.12 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-07vs SUNNYVALE MTC 18AM4.0BSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJunya Noda / Go Tejima vs Wilson Chen / Jiawen Song6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesOhan Oda / Yuta Taguchi vs Shu Deng / Tianyu Gu6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2025-06-06Won 10
W#1 SinglesBen Schreiber vs Michael Zhang6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesBen Schreiber vs Kakhaber Katselashvili6-4, 6-1
2025-05-17vs SUNNYVALE MTC 18AM4.0FWon 10
W#3 DoublesFrank Lai / Ben Schreiber vs Ning Li / James Yin6-4, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Ben Schreiber
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.03
Junya Noda
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.01
Bin Feng
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.94
Brian Tetrud
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.94
Gaku Watanabe
published
3.92
Don Scettrini
published
3.88
Kang Chen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Edward Wang
published
3.83
Steven Helmer
published
3.71
Evan Wong
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.68
Yuta Taguchi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Ohan Oda
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Hiroaki Yasutake
published
3.51
Atsushi Shirai
published 4
3.15
Hideharu Sugizaki
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Go Tejima
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steven Helmer + Ohan Oda213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ben Schreiber
6W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
4.10
Junya Noda
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
4.03
4
Bin Feng
37W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
4.01
4
Brian Tetrud
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.94
Gaku Watanabe
7W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.94
Don Scettrini
20W–8L career · no lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.92
Kang Chen
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
Edward Wang
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
Steven Helmer
14W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Evan Wong
20W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Yuta Taguchi
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Ohan Oda
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
20%79%<1%
3.62
Hiroaki Yasutake
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
4
Atsushi Shirai
1W–19L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.51
Hideharu Sugizaki
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.15
Go Tejima
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.